Literature DB >> 24235019

Dynamic low back functional motion capacity evaluation.

S A Ferguson1, W S Marras, R R Crowell.   

Abstract

Most current functional capacity evaluations focus on range of motion and strength as measures of Wellness. The goal of this study was to evaluate the dynamic functional motion capacity of controls (those without low back pain) and low back pain patients in the three cardinal planes of the body. The hypothesis was that injury would not only affect sagittal motion but also lateral and twisting motion that would load the spine in a different manner. Twenty-six age and gender matched controls and low back pain patients were tested. Trunk motion parameters of range of motion (ROM), velocity, and acceleration were measured in all three planes of the body as subjects performed three separate tasks eliciting motion in each of the three cardinal planes of the body. Controls exhibited significantly higher performance than low back pain patients in all three planes of the body for velocity and acceleration but not ROM. Single parameter discriminant function models indicated that the velocity and acceleration motion parameters distinguished between LBP patients and the control group more effectively than ROM in the cardinal planes. Multiple parameter discriminant function demonstrated that coupled motion models further increased the ability to distinguish between the control and patient groups. These results provide insight into new methods of evaluating functional capacity using velocity, acceleration, and coupling which may provide valuable information in determining the recovery of a patient.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24235019     DOI: 10.1007/BF02110883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  17 in total

Review 1.  The functional capacity evaluation: measuring maximal work abilities.

Authors:  A K Tramposh
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar

2.  Isometric lifting strength as a predictor of industrial back pain reports.

Authors:  M C Batti'e; S J Bigos; L D Fisher; T H Hansson; M E Jones; M D Wortley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Comparison of spinal mobility and isometric trunk extensor forces with electromyographic spectral analysis in identifying low back pain.

Authors:  A B Klein; L Snyder-Mackler; S H Roy; C J DeLuca
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1991-06

4.  Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting strength measures. Differences and similarities between low-back-injured and noninjured workers.

Authors:  P J Mandell; E Weitz; J I Bernstein; M H Lipton; J Morris; D Bradshaw; K P Bodkin; B Mattmiller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Physiologic strains in the lumbar spinal ligaments. An in vitro biomechanical study 1981 Volvo Award in Biomechanics.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; V K Goel; K Takata
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The role of dynamic three-dimensional trunk motion in occupationally-related low back disorders. The effects of workplace factors, trunk position, and trunk motion characteristics on risk of injury.

Authors:  W S Marras; S A Lavender; S E Leurgans; S L Rajulu; W G Allread; F A Fathallah; S A Ferguson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The effect of injury on rotational coupling at the lumbosacral joint. A biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  T R Oxland; J J Crisco; M M Panjabi; I Yamamoto
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography.

Authors:  M J Pearcy; S B Tibrewal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. II. Injury factors.

Authors:  S J Bigos; D M Spengler; N A Martin; J Zeh; L Fisher; A Nachemson; M H Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The classification of anatomic- and symptom-based low back disorders using motion measure models.

Authors:  W S Marras; M Parnianpour; S A Ferguson; J Y Kim; R R Crowell; S Bose; S R Simon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.