Literature DB >> 2940708

Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. II. Injury factors.

S J Bigos, D M Spengler, N A Martin, J Zeh, L Fisher, A Nachemson, M H Wang.   

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of back injury on industry, the authors conducted an extensive retrospective analysis of injuries among hourly employees of The Boeing Company, the largest industrial manufacturer in western Washington. The Boeing Company provided injury information on 31,200 employees for a 15-month period from July 1, 1979 to September 30, 1980. From this information, we analyzed 4,645 injury claims filed as of February 28, 1981 by 3,958 different employees. There were 900 back injuries in this group. Claims were categorized according to total incurred cost (TIC), made up of the medical costs and indemnity costs. High-cost claims were defined as those with a TIC greater than $10,000, and low-cost claims were those with a TIC less than $10,000. Among 857 claimants with 900 back injuries, lifting or material handling was much more commonly considered the cause of injury than accidents such as slips or falls. Accidents, however, had a much greater tendency to result in an expensive claim. The authors could not make reliable conclusions regarding injuries and 32 job skill classifications. The rate of injury did not vary according to day of the week or month, but a significantly higher rate of high-cost back injuries was noted on the day shift than on the evening or night shifts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2940708     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198604000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

Review 1.  Epidemic occupational pseudo-illness: the plague of acronyms.

Authors:  D S Bell
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

2.  Gender differences in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces for industrial workers observed after twenty years.

Authors:  Vincent M Ciriello; Rammohan V Maikala; Patrick G Dempsey; Niall V O'Brien
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  The reliability and validity of two new tests of maximum lifting capacity.

Authors:  J Alpert; L Matheson; W Beam; V Mooney
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-03

4.  The effect of lumbar support belts on isometric force production during a simulated lift.

Authors:  M S Sullivan; T P Mayhew
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-09

5.  Industrial back belts and low back pain: Mechanisms and outcomes.

Authors:  B A Barron; M Feuerstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1994-09

Review 6.  Disc herniations in astronauts: What causes them, and what does it tell us about herniation on earth?

Authors:  Daniel L Belavy; Michael Adams; Helena Brisby; Barbara Cagnie; Lieven Danneels; Jeremy Fairbank; Alan R Hargens; Stefan Judex; Richard A Scheuring; Roope Sovelius; Jill Urban; Jaap H van Dieën; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Work related risk factors for musculoskeletal complaints in the spinning industry in Lithuania.

Authors:  M Gamperiene; H Stigum
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Dynamic low back functional motion capacity evaluation.

Authors:  S A Ferguson; W S Marras; R R Crowell
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-12

9.  Factors influencing the cost of chronic low back injuries: An analysis of data from independent medical examinations.

Authors:  W A Earman; G B Andersson; F Leavitt; T W McNeill; I H Durudogan; J Reagan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-03

10.  Evaluation of impairment related to low back pain.

Authors:  J R Langworthy
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.