Literature DB >> 24233482

Prediction: A six-year follow-up.

J J Jansky1, M J Hoffman, J Layton, F Sugar, M Davies.   

Abstract

The prereading and reading performance of a group of 370 predominantly Hispanic, bilingual public school children was followed for six years. The aim of the study was to compare the factorial make-up and predictive validity of tests used in the current research with findings from a previous study. The early study had followed the children from the end of their kindergarten year until the end of second grade. For purposes of the present study a 13-test predictor battery was administered to the children at the beginning of their first-grade year. This battery included a number of measures used in the early study, among them a 5-test Screening Index developed in the course of that study. Records were obtained of the follow-up children's 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th grade reading test scores. Factor analysis of the pool of 13 predictor tests showed a two-cluster battery structure. These clusters closely resembled two of the four factors defined in the early study. As used with the group of bilingual children, the Screening Index misclassified many of the failing readers, as well as others who went ahead to read at grade level. The Screening Index quite accurately identified, across grades, children who eventually read well. A number of predictor tests administered at beginning of first grade continued to show significant correlations with reading at all grade levels. The consistent contribution of the predictor tests with reading points to their continuing usefulness as a point of departure for assessing children's readiness to read.

Entities:  

Year:  1989        PMID: 24233482     DOI: 10.1007/BF02656911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Dyslexia        ISSN: 0736-9387


  10 in total

1.  The concept of specific reading retardation.

Authors:  M Rutter; W Yule
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 8.982

2.  Tests designed to discover potential reading difficulties at the six-year-old level.

Authors:  K DE HIRSCH
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  1957-07

3.  Rapid "automatized" naming (R.A.N): dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities.

Authors:  M B Denckla; R G Rudel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The prediction of good and poor reading before kindergarten entry: a nine-year follow-up.

Authors:  N A Badian
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1988-02

5.  The relationship between neuropsychological/perceptual performance and socioeconomic status in children with learning disabilities.

Authors:  D C Morrison; S P Hinshaw
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1988-02

6.  Improving the prediction of reading for the individual child: a four-year follow-up.

Authors:  N A Badian
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1986-05

7.  Dyslexia.

Authors:  F R Vellutino
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.142

8.  Scanning, diagnosis, and intervention in the prevention of reading disabilities: II. Teach: Learning tasks for the prevention of learning disabilities.

Authors:  R A Hagin; A A Silver; R Beecher
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  1978 Aug-Sep

9.  Disabled readers: their intellectual and perceptual capacities at differing ages.

Authors:  J W Miller; M C McKenna
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1981-04

10.  Screening for reading problems: The utility of SEARCH.

Authors:  D Morrison; P Mantzicopoulos; E Stone
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1988-01
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Predicting reading performance using the slingerland procedures.

Authors:  S Sears; B Keogh
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1993-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.