Literature DB >> 2423236

I.v. infusion of opioids for cancer pain: clinical review and guidelines for use.

R K Portenoy, D E Moulin, A Rogers, C E Inturrisi, K M Foley.   

Abstract

To assess the safety, efficacy, and use of continuous iv infusion (CI) of opioids for cancer pain, we reviewed the clinical experience of 36 patients who received 46 CIs. CI was always preceded by a period of repetitive dosing of opioids. Morphine was used in 36 CIs, methadone in four, hydromorphone in four, oxymorphone in one, and levorphanol in one. Mean doses during CI were the morphine equivalent of 17 mg/hour (range, 0.7-100) at the start, 69 mg/hour (range, 4-480) at the maximum, and 52 mg/hour (range, 1-480) at termination. Pain relief was acceptable during 28 CIs, unacceptable during 17, and unknown during one. There were few toxic effects other than sedation. Twenty-five patients died, 12 resumed im or oral opioids, six continued CI with a different opioid (yielding analgesia in two), and outcome was undetermined in three. This review suggests that (a) CI is safe, (b) analgesia may require rapid escalation of infusion rates, (c) patient response varies and lack of acceptable analgesia may occur in up to one-third, (d) ineffective CI with one drug may be followed by success with another, (e) CI should be preceded by a period of repetitive iv boluses with the same drug, and (f) guidelines can be developed which incorporate pharmacokinetic principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2423236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  11 in total

1.  A computer-based system for controlling plasma opioid concentration according to patient need for analgesia.

Authors:  H F Hill; R C Jacobson; B A Coda; A M Mackie
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  [The estimation of the i.m. morphine-equivalent in cancer pain treatment with different opioids or different routes of administrations. Practical meaning and limitations.].

Authors:  J Jage; R K Portenoy; K M Foley
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Continuous intravenous infusion of opioid analgesics for severe pain.

Authors:  E Latimer; F Burge
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Identifying patients at risk for, and treatment of major psychiatric complications of cancer.

Authors:  W Breitbart
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Pitfalls in the use of opiates in treatment of cancer pain.

Authors:  D A Lossignol
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Palliative care and melanoma: the care of the patient with progressive disease.

Authors:  J N Lickiss
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Subcutaneous narcotic infusions for cancer pain: treatment outcome and guidelines for use.

Authors:  D E Moulin; N G Johnson; N Murray-Parsons; M F Geoghegan; V A Goodwin; M A Chester
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Patient-controlled analgesia. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  H F Hill; L E Mather
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Chronic morphine use does not induce peripheral tolerance in a rat model of inflammatory pain.

Authors:  Christian Zöllner; Shaaban A Mousa; Oliver Fischer; Heike L Rittner; Mohammed Shaqura; Alexander Brack; Mehdi Shakibaei; Waltraud Binder; Florian Urban; Christoph Stein; Michael Schäfer
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of tolerance to morphine analgesia during infusion in rats.

Authors:  D M Ouellet; G M Pollack
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1995-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.