Literature DB >> 1371946

Subcutaneous narcotic infusions for cancer pain: treatment outcome and guidelines for use.

D E Moulin1, N G Johnson, N Murray-Parsons, M F Geoghegan, V A Goodwin, M A Chester.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines for the institution and maintenance of a continuous subcutaneous narcotic infusion program for cancer patients with chronic pain through an analysis of the narcotic requirements and treatment outcomes of patients who underwent such therapy and a comparison of the costs of two commonly used infusion systems.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary care facilities and patients' homes. PATIENTS: Of 481 patients seen in consultation for cancer pain between July 1987 and April 1990, 60 (12%) met the eligibility criteria (i.e., standard medical management had failed, and they had adequate supervision at home). INTERVENTION: Continuous subcutaneous infusion with hydromorphone hydrochloride or morphine started on an inpatient basis and continued at home whenever possible. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient selectivity, narcotic dosing requirements, discharge rate, patient preference for analgesic regimen, side effects, complications and cost-effectiveness.
RESULTS: The mean initial maintenance infusion dose after dose titration was almost three times higher than the dose required before infusion (hydromorphone or equivalent 6.2 v. 2.1 mg/h). Eighteen patients died, and the remaining 42 were discharged home for a mean of 94.4 (standard deviation 128.3) days (extremes 12 and 741 days). The mean maximum infusion rate was 24.1 mg/h (extremes 0.5 and 180 mg/h). All but one of the patients preferred the infusion system to their previous oral analgesic regimen. Despite major dose escalations nausea and vomiting were well controlled in all cases. Twelve patients (20%) experienced serious systemic toxic effects or complications; six became encephalopathic, which necessitated dose reduction, five had a subcutaneous infection necessitating antibiotic treatment, and one had respiratory depression. The programmable computerized infusion pump was found to be more cost-effective than the disposable infusion device after a break-even point of 8 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous subcutaneous infusion of opioid drugs with the use of a portable programmable pump is safe and effective in selected patients who have failed to respond to standard medical treatment of their cancer pain. Dose titration may require rapid dose escalation, but this is usually well tolerated. For most communities embarking on such a program a programmable infusion system will be more cost-effective than a disposable system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1371946      PMCID: PMC1488669     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of continuous subcutaneous and intravenous hydromorphone infusions for management of cancer pain.

Authors:  D E Moulin; J H Kreeft; N Murray-Parsons; A I Bouquillon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-02-23       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Continuous sc infusion of narcotics using a portable disposable device in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  E Bruera; C Brenneis; M Michaud; S Chadwick; R N MacDonald
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1987-06

3.  I.v. infusion of opioids for cancer pain: clinical review and guidelines for use.

Authors:  R K Portenoy; D E Moulin; A Rogers; C E Inturrisi; K M Foley
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-05

4.  Use of the subcutaneous route for the administration of narcotics in patients with cancer pain.

Authors:  E Bruera; C Brenneis; M Michaud; R Bacovsky; S Chadwick; A Emeno; N MacDonald
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Treatment of severe cancer pain by low-dose continuous subcutaneous morphine.

Authors:  Heinz Drexel; Alexander Dzien; Robert W Spiegel; Alois H Lang; Christoph Breier; Klaus Abbrederis; Josef R Patsch; Herbert Braunsteiner
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Inpatient narcotic infusions for patients with cancer pain.

Authors:  F D Ferris; I G Kerr; C De Angelis; M Sone; S Hume
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.250

7.  A cost-minimization study of cancer patients requiring a narcotic infusion in hospital and at home.

Authors:  F D Ferris; H B Wodinsky; I G Kerr; M Sone; S Hume; C Coons
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Continuous subcutaneous infusion of morphine in children with cancer.

Authors:  A W Miser; D M Davis; C S Hughes; A F Mulne; J S Miser
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1983-04

9.  Lack of analgesic effect of opioids on neuropathic and idiopathic forms of pain.

Authors:  S Arnér; B A Meyerson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Patient-controlled subcutaneous hydromorphone versus continuous subcutaneous infusion for the treatment of cancer pain.

Authors:  E Bruera; C Brenneis; M Michaud; K MacMillan; J Hanson; R N MacDonald
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-09-21       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Cost considerations in patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  A Jacox; D B Carr; D M Mahrenholz; B M Ferrell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Subcutaneous or intravenous opioid administration by patient-controlled analgesia in cancer pain: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Lisa Nijland; Pia Schmidt; Michael Frosch; Julia Wager; Bettina Hübner-Möhler; Ross Drake; Boris Zernikow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Diffusion of standards of care for cancer pain.

Authors:  N Hagen; J Young; N MacDonald
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.