Literature DB >> 24231900

Validation of an empirical damage model for aging and in vivo injury of the murine patellar tendon.

Mark R Buckley, Andrew A Dunkman, Katherine E Reuther, Akash Kumar, Lydia Pathmanathan, David P Beason, David E Birk, Louis J Soslowsky.   

Abstract

While useful models have been proposed to predict the mechanical impact of damage in tendon and other soft tissues, the applicability of these models for describing in vivo injury and age-related degeneration has not been investigated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop and validate a simple damage model to predict mechanical alterations in mouse patellar tendons after aging, injury, or healing. To characterize baseline properties, uninjured controls at age 150 days were cyclically loaded across three strain levels and five frequencies. For comparison, damage was induced in mature (120 day-old) mice through either injury or aging. Injured mice were sacrificed at three or six weeks after surgery, while aged mice were sacrificed at either 300 or 570 days old. Changes in mechanical properties (relative to baseline) in the three week post-injury group were assessed and used to develop an empirical damage model based on a simple damage parameter related to the equilibrium stress at a prescribed strain (6%). From the derived model, the viscoelastic properties of the 300 day-old, 570 day-old, and six week post-injury groups were accurately predicted. Across testing conditions, nearly all correlations between predicted and measured parameters were statistically significant and coefficients of determination ranged from R² = 0.25 to 0.97. Results suggest that the proposed damage model could exploit simple in vivo mechanical measurements to predict how an injured or aged tendon will respond to complex physiological loading regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24231900      PMCID: PMC3705855          DOI: 10.1115/1.4023700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  29 in total

1.  Subfailure damage in ligament: a structural and cellular evaluation.

Authors:  Paolo P Provenzano; Dennis Heisey; Kei Hayashi; Roderic Lakes; Ray Vanderby
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-01

2.  The effect of rotator cuff tears on reaction forces at the glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  I M Parsons; Maria Apreleva; Freddie H Fu; Savio L Y Woo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Cell-matrix response in tendon injury.

Authors:  W B Leadbetter
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.182

4.  Degeneration and rupture of the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  J M Fox; M E Blazina; F W Jobe; R K Kerlan; V S Carter; C L Shields; G J Carlson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A potential mechanism for age-related declines in patellar tendon biomechanics.

Authors:  M R Dressler; D L Butler; R Wenstrup; H A Awad; F Smith; G P Boivin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Extensor carpi ulnaris. Its relationship to the stability of the distal radio-ulnar joint.

Authors:  M Spinner; E B Kaplan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1970 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Shoulder pain.

Authors:  R E Leach; A A Schepsis
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.182

8.  In vivo human tendon mechanical properties.

Authors:  C N Maganaris; J P Paul
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Fatigue damage of human tendons.

Authors:  H Schechtman; D L Bader
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Decorin expression is important for age-related changes in tendon structure and mechanical properties.

Authors:  Andrew A Dunkman; Mark R Buckley; Michael J Mienaltowski; Sheila M Adams; Stephen J Thomas; Lauren Satchell; Akash Kumar; Lydia Pathmanathan; David P Beason; Renato V Iozzo; David E Birk; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 11.583

View more
  7 in total

1.  The injury response of aged tendons in the absence of biglycan and decorin.

Authors:  Andrew A Dunkman; Mark R Buckley; Michael J Mienaltowski; Sheila M Adams; Stephen J Thomas; Akash Kumar; David P Beason; Renato V Iozzo; David E Birk; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.583

2.  The tendon injury response is influenced by decorin and biglycan.

Authors:  Andrew A Dunkman; Mark R Buckley; Michael J Mienaltowski; Sheila M Adams; Stephen J Thomas; Lauren Satchell; Akash Kumar; Lydia Pathmanathan; David P Beason; Renato V Iozzo; David E Birk; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Achilles tendons from decorin- and biglycan-null mouse models have inferior mechanical and structural properties predicted by an image-based empirical damage model.

Authors:  J A Gordon; B R Freedman; A Zuskov; R V Iozzo; D E Birk; L J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Biomechanical and structural response of healing Achilles tendon to fatigue loading following acute injury.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; Joseph J Sarver; Mark R Buckley; Pramod B Voleti; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Injury response of geriatric mouse patellar tendons.

Authors:  Michael J Mienaltowski; Andrew A Dunkman; Mark R Buckley; David P Beason; Sheila M Adams; David E Birk; Louis J Soslowsky
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 6.  The role of animal models in tendon research.

Authors:  M W Hast; A Zuskov; L J Soslowsky
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Models of tendon development and injury.

Authors:  Sophia K Theodossiou; Nathan R Schiele
Journal:  BMC Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-11-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.