BACKGROUND: There have been various efforts to identify less costly but still accurate methods for monitoring the response to HIV treatment. We evaluated a pooling method to determine if this could improve screening efficiency and reduce costs while maintaining accuracy in Seoul, South Korea. METHODS: We conducted the first prospective study of pooled nucleic acid testing (NAT) using a 5 minipool + algorithm strategy versus individual viral load testing for patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) between November 2011 and August 2012 at an urban hospital in Seoul, South Korea. The viral load assay used has a lower level of detection of 20 HIV RNA copies/ml, and the cost per assay is US$ 136. The 5 minipool +algorithm strategy was applied and 43 pooled samples were evaluated. The relative efficiency and accuracy of the pooled NAT were compared with those of individual testing. RESULTS: Using the individual viral load assay, 15 of 215 (7%) plasma samples had more than 200 HIV RNA copies/ml. The pooled NAT using the 5 minipool + algorithm strategy was applied to 43 pooled samples; 111 tests were needed to test all samples when virologic failure was defined at HIV RNA ≥ 200 copies/ml. Therefore, 104 tests were saved over individual testing, with a relative efficiency of 0.48. When evaluating costs, a total of US$ 14,144 was saved for 215 individual samples during 10 months. The negative predictive value was 99.5% for all samples with HIV RNA ≥ 200 copies/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled NAT with 5 minipool + algorithm strategy seems to be a very promising approach to effectively monitor patients receiving ART and to save resources.
BACKGROUND: There have been various efforts to identify less costly but still accurate methods for monitoring the response to HIV treatment. We evaluated a pooling method to determine if this could improve screening efficiency and reduce costs while maintaining accuracy in Seoul, South Korea. METHODS: We conducted the first prospective study of pooled nucleic acid testing (NAT) using a 5 minipool + algorithm strategy versus individual viral load testing for patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) between November 2011 and August 2012 at an urban hospital in Seoul, South Korea. The viral load assay used has a lower level of detection of 20 HIV RNA copies/ml, and the cost per assay is US$ 136. The 5 minipool +algorithm strategy was applied and 43 pooled samples were evaluated. The relative efficiency and accuracy of the pooled NAT were compared with those of individual testing. RESULTS: Using the individual viral load assay, 15 of 215 (7%) plasma samples had more than 200 HIV RNA copies/ml. The pooled NAT using the 5 minipool + algorithm strategy was applied to 43 pooled samples; 111 tests were needed to test all samples when virologic failure was defined at HIV RNA ≥ 200 copies/ml. Therefore, 104 tests were saved over individual testing, with a relative efficiency of 0.48. When evaluating costs, a total of US$ 14,144 was saved for 215 individual samples during 10 months. The negative predictive value was 99.5% for all samples with HIV RNA ≥ 200 copies/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The pooled NAT with 5 minipool + algorithm strategy seems to be a very promising approach to effectively monitor patients receiving ART and to save resources.
Authors: Myres W Tilghman; Don Diego Guerena; Alexei Licea; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Douglas D Richman; Susanne May; Davey M Smith Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Susan J Little; Sarah Holte; Jean-Pierre Routy; Eric S Daar; Marty Markowitz; Ann C Collier; Richard A Koup; John W Mellors; Elizabeth Connick; Brian Conway; Michael Kilby; Lei Wang; Jeannette M Whitcomb; Nicholas S Hellmann; Douglas D Richman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David M Moore; Anna Awor; Robert Downing; Jonathan Kaplan; Julio S G Montaner; John Hancock; Willy Were; Jonathan Mermin Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2008-12-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: P Bagnarelli; S Menzo; A Valenza; S Paolucci; S Petroni; G Scalise; R Sampaolesi; A Manzin; P E Varaldo; M Clementi Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Christopher D Pilcher; J Todd McPherson; Peter A Leone; Marlene Smurzynski; Judy Owen-O'Dowd; Amy L Peace-Brewer; Juanita Harris; Charles B Hicks; Joseph J Eron; Susan A Fiscus Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Christopher D Pilcher; Matthew A Price; Irving F Hoffman; Shannon Galvin; Francis E A Martinson; Peter N Kazembe; Joseph J Eron; William C Miller; Susan A Fiscus; Myron S Cohen Journal: AIDS Date: 2004-02-20 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Davey M Smith; Susanne J May; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Matthew C Strain; Caroline C Ignacio; Richard H Haubrich; Douglas D Richman; Constance A Benson; Susan J Little Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Adam Brand; Susanne May; James P Hughes; Gertrude Nakigozi; Steven J Reynolds; Erin E Gabriel Journal: Stat Med Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Karyn Heavner; Craig Newschaffer; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Deborah Bennett; Igor Burstyn Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 3.390