CONTEXT: Acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection cannot be diagnosed by routine antibody tests and is rarely diagnosed in clinical practice. However, HIV nucleic acid-based testing is widely used to screen for antibody-negative acute infection among low-risk blood donors. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of screening in high-volume laboratories for acute and long-term HIV infection in a routine HIV testing population, in which HIV infection prevalence is low, using specimen pooling and HIV RNA reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. DESIGN AND SETTING: Clinical diagnostic performance evaluation at a state-funded public health virology and serology laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8505 consecutive individuals presenting for routine HIV counseling and testing during a total of 20 business days to simulate a month of testing in August and December 2001 at 110 publicly funded testing sites in North Carolina. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of acute and long-term HIV infection. Serum specimens negative by HIV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were screened in pools by an ultrasensitive HIV RNA RT-PCR test. Results for individual HIV RNA-positive specimens were reclassified as true or false according to results of confirmatory testing. RESULTS: Of the 8505 individuals screened, 8194 had not previously tested HIV positive and had sufficient serum to complete the testing protocol. Of those, 39 had long-term HIV infection (prevalence, 47.6 per 10,000 at-risk persons [95% confidence interval, 33.8-65.0 per 10,000]). Of the 8155 at-risk individuals whose antibody tests were negative, 5 were HIV RNA positive. Four of those had true-positive acute infection (prevalence, 4.9 per 10,000 [95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.5 per 10,000]). All 4 were women; 2 developed symptoms consistent with an acute retroviral syndrome in the week after testing. Screening all specimens required 147 HIV RNA tests. Overall specificity of the strategy was 0.9999. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the widespread diagnosis of acute HIV infections in a routine testing population is not only possible but feasible using specimen pooling and nucleic acid testing. These additional procedures may increase diagnostic yield by approximately 10% compared with conventional HIV antibody testing.
CONTEXT: Acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection cannot be diagnosed by routine antibody tests and is rarely diagnosed in clinical practice. However, HIV nucleic acid-based testing is widely used to screen for antibody-negative acute infection among low-risk blood donors. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of screening in high-volume laboratories for acute and long-term HIV infection in a routine HIV testing population, in which HIV infection prevalence is low, using specimen pooling and HIV RNA reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. DESIGN AND SETTING: Clinical diagnostic performance evaluation at a state-funded public health virology and serology laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 8505 consecutive individuals presenting for routine HIV counseling and testing during a total of 20 business days to simulate a month of testing in August and December 2001 at 110 publicly funded testing sites in North Carolina. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of acute and long-term HIV infection. Serum specimens negative by HIV enzyme immunoassay (EIA) were screened in pools by an ultrasensitive HIV RNA RT-PCR test. Results for individual HIV RNA-positive specimens were reclassified as true or false according to results of confirmatory testing. RESULTS: Of the 8505 individuals screened, 8194 had not previously tested HIV positive and had sufficient serum to complete the testing protocol. Of those, 39 had long-term HIV infection (prevalence, 47.6 per 10,000 at-risk persons [95% confidence interval, 33.8-65.0 per 10,000]). Of the 8155 at-risk individuals whose antibody tests were negative, 5 were HIV RNA positive. Four of those had true-positive acute infection (prevalence, 4.9 per 10,000 [95% confidence interval, 1.3-12.5 per 10,000]). All 4 were women; 2 developed symptoms consistent with an acute retroviral syndrome in the week after testing. Screening all specimens required 147 HIV RNA tests. Overall specificity of the strategy was 0.9999. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the widespread diagnosis of acute HIV infections in a routine testing population is not only possible but feasible using specimen pooling and nucleic acid testing. These additional procedures may increase diagnostic yield by approximately 10% compared with conventional HIV antibody testing.
Authors: Sara Bodach; Sarah Braunstein; Marie Antoinette Bernard; Charulata Jain Sabharwal; Adey Tsega; Colin Shepard Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2012 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Gregory D Sempowski; Charles B Hicks; Joseph J Eron; John A Bartlett; Laura P Hale; Guido Ferrari; Lloyd J Edwards; Susan Fiscus; Barton F Haynes Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Ann M Dennis; Stéphane Hué; Christopher B Hurt; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph Sebastian; Deenan Pillay; Joseph J Eron Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Christopher B Hurt; Derrick D Matthews; Molly S Calabria; Kelly A Green; Adaora A Adimora; Carol E Golin; Lisa B Hightow-Weidman Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Richard Silvera; Dylan Stein; Richard Hutt; Robert Hagerty; Demetre Daskalakis; Fred Valentine; Michael Marmor Journal: Open AIDS J Date: 2010-03-05