Literature DB >> 24227965

Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: A comparative study of outcome in patients with preexisting glaucoma.

Pho Nguyen1, Shabnam Khashabi, Vikas Chopra, Brian Francis, Martin Heur, Jonathan C Song, Samuel C Yiu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare postoperative complications after Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in patients with and without glaucoma.
METHODS: For this retrospective study a series of 298 DSAEK cases performed at the Doheny Eye Institute were taken, we compared postoperative complications in eyes with glaucoma on medication (55) or with previous glaucoma surgeries (64) with a time-matched group of all other DSAEK cases (179, control).
RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 1.85 ± 1.12 years, the complication rates were 12.8%, 11.1%, and 26.8% for postoperative graft detachment, graft failure, and IOP elevation, respectively. Graft detachment was an independent risk factor for graft failure (odds ratio OR = 12.35, 95% confidence interval CI [5.46-27.90], P < 0.001). Graft detachment was not associated with either history of glaucoma or glaucoma surgery (P > 0.05). Glaucoma on medication had no increased risks of graft failure compared to normal eyes (P = 0.38). However, increased risk of failure was seen in eyes with prior incisional glaucoma surgeries (OR = 4.26, 95% CI [1.87-9.71], P < 0.001). Medically managed glaucoma has increased risks of postoperative IOP elevation (OR = 2.39, 95% CI [1.25-4.57], P = 0.013), whereas surgically managed glaucoma has no significant elevation (P = 0.23). Elevation of IOP was not significantly correlated with graft failure (P = 0.21).
CONCLUSION: DSAEK is the preferred treatment for corneal endothelial dystrophy. We observed that having glaucoma or glaucoma surgery is not associated with graft detachment. A history of glaucoma surgery and postoperative graft detachment appeared to be important risk factors for graft failure. And more studies are indicated to study long-term IOP evolution in post-DSAEK patients and its association with graft survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea transplant; DSAEK; Drainage device; Glaucoma; Graft failure; Intraocular pressure; Trabeculoplasty; Tube shunt

Year:  2013        PMID: 24227965      PMCID: PMC3809502          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2013.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1319-4534


  34 in total

1.  Posterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  C W TILLETT
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1956-03       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Tonometry comparison: Goldmann versus Tono-Pen.

Authors:  K S Kooner; J C Cooksey; J B Barron; T J Zimmerman; R K Gupte; J L Wall
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-01

Review 3.  Inconsistency of the published definition of ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Ivan M Tavares; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Secondary angle closure caused by air migrating behind the pupil in descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Jung S Lee; Neel R Desai; Gregory W Schmidt; Albert S Jun; Oliver D Schein; Walter J Stark; Allen O Eghrari; John D Gottsch
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Intraocular pressure changes following Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Edgar M Espana; Zachary M Robertson; Bo Huang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Recipient risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study.

Authors:  Alan Sugar; Jean Paul Tanner; Mariya Dontchev; Brad Tennant; Robert L Schultze; Steven P Dunn; Thomas D Lindquist; Robin L Gal; Roy W Beck; Craig Kollman; Mark J Mannis; Edward J Holland
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  Irit Bahar; Igor Kaiserman; Penny McAllum; Allan Slomovic; David Rootman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Complications of Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes at One Institute.

Authors:  Leejee H Suh; Sonia H Yoo; Avnish Deobhakta; Kendall E Donaldson; Eduardo C Alfonso; William W Culbertson; Terrence P O'Brien
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Precut tissue in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor characteristics and early postoperative complications.

Authors:  Edwin S Chen; Mark A Terry; Neda Shamie; Karen L Hoar; Daniel J Friend
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Alterations in the aqueous humor proteome in patients with a glaucoma shunt device.

Authors:  Arundhati Anshu; Marianne O Price; Matthew R Richardson; Zaneer M Segu; Xianyin Lai; Mervin C Yoder; Francis W Price
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.367

View more
  3 in total

1.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) early stage graft failure in eyes with preexisting glaucoma.

Authors:  Maximilian Treder; Maged Alnawaiseh; Nicole Eter
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Modified Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for eyes with glaucoma drainage devices and shallow anterior chambers.

Authors:  Alfonso Vasquez-Perez; Syed Mohammed Naqib; Mayank A Nanavaty
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Ocular Hypertension/Glaucoma After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Authors:  Mohamed Elalfy; Sundas Maqsood; Shady Soliman; Sherif Momtaz Hegazy; Ahmed Abdou Hannon; Zisis Gatzioufas; Damian Lake; Samer Hamada
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.