Literature DB >> 18378315

Complications of Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes at One Institute.

Leejee H Suh1, Sonia H Yoo, Avnish Deobhakta, Kendall E Donaldson, Eduardo C Alfonso, William W Culbertson, Terrence P O'Brien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compile a survey of complications during and after Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in 118 eyes conducted by cornea subspecialists at a single academic center.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighteen eyes undergoing DSAEK in 99 patients.
METHODS: Outcomes of DSAEK performed in 118 eyes by 10 surgeons were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty-four eyes had pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Forty-one had Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and cataract. Three had aphakic bullous keratopathy. In 10 eyes, previous DSAEK performed at the same institution failed. Complications of DSAEK were noted from the intraoperative and postoperative periods. Detached DSAEK grafts were repositioned, rebubbled, or both immediately after diagnosis of this complication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative and postoperative complications of DSAEK.
RESULTS: Graft detachment was the most common type of complication encountered. In 27 (23%) of 118 eyes, graft detachments were observed. Twenty-five eyes with detached grafts successfully were repositioned or rebubbled after surgery, or both. In 1 eye, a previously detached graft reattached spontaneously. In 1 aphakic eye, the graft detached into the vitreous cavity. In 17 eyes, successful reattachment of the cornea occurred (68%). Twenty-one of the 118 eyes were considered to have failed DSAEK, meaning that persistent edema was present after DSAEK. Seven (6%) demonstrated graft rejection. In 5 eyes (4%), retinal detachment (RD) developed. In 6 (5%), cystoid macular edema developed. In 1 aphakic patient, an air bubble could not be maintained during surgery, and sulfur hexafluoride was injected into the anterior chamber. In 1 eye (1%), epithelial ingrowth developed. One eye (1%) demonstrated blood in the graft interface. In 1 eye (1%), a limited intraoperative suprachoroidal hemorrhage occurred. Two eyes (2%) had pupillary block after surgery that resolved with removal of the air bubble.
CONCLUSIONS: Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty has become a popular and effective treatment for corneal endothelial dysfunction, but complications resulting from DSAEK do occur. Graft detachment is the most common complication, but postoperative repositioning or rebubbling, or both, allow for graft reattachment in most cases. Other complications found in this series were graft failure, graft rejection, cystoid macular edema, RD, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, and pupillary block. Retained Descemet's membrane and epithelial ingrowth, are potential causes of dislocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378315     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  54 in total

1.  Study of factors for unsuitability of DSAEK in cases of corneal decompensation following cataract surgery.

Authors:  Namrata Sharma; Ritika Sachdev; Ravindra M Pandey; Jeewan S Titiyal; Rajesh Sinha; Radhika Tandon; Rasik B Vajpayee
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Venting incisions in DSAEK: implications for astigmatism, aberrations, visual acuity, and graft detachment.

Authors:  Maria Hovlykke; Anders Ivarsen; Jesper Hjortdal
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Endothelial keratoplasty: a comparison of complication rates and endothelial survival between precut tissue and surgeon-cut tissue by a single DSAEK surgeon.

Authors:  Mark A Terry
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2009-12

4.  Long-term presence of metallic particles in the DSAEK interface.

Authors:  G D Kymionis; V P Kankariya; G A Kontadakis
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Incidence of cystoid macular edema after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Eduard Pedemonte-Sarrias; Toni Salvador Playà; Irene Sassot Cladera; Oscar Gris; Joan Ribas Martínez; José García-Arumí; Núria Giménez
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the treatment of cystoid macular edema post Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Koji Kitazawa; Kanae Kayukawa; Koichi Wakimasu; Tsutomu Inatomi; Osamu Hieda; Kazuhiko Mori; Chie Sotozono; Shigeru Kinoshita
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Intraocular pressure after descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK).

Authors:  Carla P Nieuwendaal; Ivanka J E van der Meulen; Ruth Lapid-Gortzak; Maarten P Mourits
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet's Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Allister Gibbons; Ella H Leung; Sonia H Yoo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Intraocular pressure changes following Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty.

Authors:  Edgar M Espana; Zachary M Robertson; Bo Huang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Shreya S Prabhu; Rola Kaakeh; Alan Sugar; Dean G Smith; Roni M Shtein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.