Literature DB >> 24227213

Food deprivation affects preference of sheep for foods varying in nutrients and a toxin.

J Wang1, F D Provenza.   

Abstract

We investigated how food deprivation affected preference of lambs for foods that varied in concentrations of nutrients and a toxin. Thirty lambs (10 lambs/treatment) were fed different amounts of alfalfa pellets (high in protein, marginal in energy for growth) as a basal ration (20, 40, or 60 g/kg body weight). Every morning, prior to ingesting the basal ration of alfalfa pellets, each lamb was offerend three foods for 15 min. The foods contained different amounts of energy and a toxin, depending on the addition of barley (energy) and LiCl (toxin) to alfalfa. The proportions of barley and LiCl changed every five days during the 25-day study. The results showed: (1) all lambs preferred food that was high > intermediate > low in energy (barley) in the absence of LiCl, but all lambs decreased consumption of foods high in energy as LiCl concentrations increased; (2) the greater the level of food deprivation, the lower the consumption of foods containing LiCl, even if the foods provided high levels of energy; (3) lambs moderately food deprived or fed ad libitum ingested more LiCl than lambs that were highly deprived; and (4) lambs quickly (15 min/day) regulated intake of foods in response to changes in barley and LiCl concentrations. Thus, our results suggest that the interaction between nutritional status and toxicosis plays an important role in food preference of lambs. Our findings also suggest that toxic plants may kill herbivores that lack nutritious alternative foods not only because the animals are forced to be less discriminating, but also because they are more susceptible to toxins.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24227213     DOI: 10.1007/BF02040092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  9 in total

1.  Preference for wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch.

Authors:  J J Villalba; F D Provenza
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Modeling metabolic costs of allelochemical ingestion by foraging herbivores.

Authors:  A W Illius; N S Jessop
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 3.  Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands.

Authors:  F D Provenza
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Food preference and acceptance of novel foods by lambs depend on the composition of the basal diet.

Authors:  J Wang; F D Provenza
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Developmental neurobiology of salt taste sensation.

Authors:  D L Hill; C M Mistretta
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Lithium toxicity in cattle.

Authors:  J H Johnson; H R Crookshank; H E Smalley
Journal:  Vet Hum Toxicol       Date:  1980-08

7.  Consequences of biotransformation of plant secondary metabolites on acid-base metabolism in mammals-A final common pathway?

Authors:  W J Foley; S McLean; S J Cork
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Effects of variation in the dietary supply of cysteine and methionine on liver concentration of glutathione and "active sulfate" (PAPS) and serum levels of sulfate, cystine, methionine and taurine: relation to the metabolism of acetaminophen.

Authors:  E J Glazenburg; I M Jekel-Halsema; E Scholtens; A J Baars; G J Mulder
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Mechanisms of fasting-induced potentiation of acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in the rat.

Authors:  V F Price; M G Miller; D J Jollow
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 5.858

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Foraging in chemically diverse environments: energy, protein, and alternative foods influence ingestion of plant secondary metabolites by lambs.

Authors:  Juan J Villalba; Frederick D Provenza
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Differential susceptibility to Eucalyptus secondary compounds explains feeding by the common ringtail (Pseudocheirus peregrinus) and common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula).

Authors:  K J Marsh; W J Foley; A Cowling; I R Wallis
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 2.200

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.