Literature DB >> 24227196

Cleanup of fractured rock aquifers: Implications of matrix diffusion.

R D Mutch1, J I Scott, D J Wilson.   

Abstract

As contamination moves through a fractured rock aquifer, it tends to diffuse from the flowing fracture water into the rock's essentially stagnant pore water. This process tends both to retard a contamination plume's advance through a fractured rock aquifer and to substantially increase the difficulty of purging contamination from the aquifer. A mathematical model has been developed to evaluate the potential impact of this phenomenon upon water quality restoration in fractured rock aquifers. The numerical modeling reveals that cleanup of fractured rock aquifers will, in many cases, require many decades, even centuries, to achieve, particularly where substantial improvements in water quality are sought. The parameters which most strongly govern the degree to which matrix diffusion prolongs the aquifer restoration process are the rock's matrix porosity, fracture spacing, and matrix diffusivity, the chemical identity of the contaminant(s), and the length of time the aquifer has been contaminated.Since sedimentary rocks tend to have both relatively high matrix porosities and matrix diffusivities, it can be particularly difficult to purge contamination from sedimentary rock aquifers. Crystalline rocks, in contrast, typically have lower matrix porosities and matrix diffusivities, and therefore undergo more rapid cleanup. However, even in crystalline rocks, attainment of very high degrees of water quality improvement may be problematic. Numerical modeling also indicates that conventional groundwater 'pump and treat' programs are not likely to be very effective in speeding up aquifer restoration if the rate limiting step in the process is diffusion of contaminants from the rock matrix.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 24227196     DOI: 10.1007/BF00568799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  4 in total

1.  Migration of pollutants in groundwater: I. reduction of numerical dispersion by conformal mapping.

Authors:  D J Wilson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Migration of pollutants in groundwater. II. adsorbable pollutants and numerical dispersion reduction.

Authors:  K N Carter; M Saenz; D J Wilson; P W Rosten
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Migration of pollutants in groundwater. III. Numerical dispersion reduction with cartesian coordinates.

Authors:  W Abraham; D J Wilson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Migration of pollutants in groundwater. IV. Modeling of the pumping of contaminants from fractured bedrock.

Authors:  D J Wilson; R D Mutch
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.513

  4 in total
  8 in total

1.  Migration of pollutants in groundwater. V. Modelling the removal of DNAPL droplets by flushing.

Authors:  D J Wilson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  The impact of well-field configuration and permeability heterogeneity on contaminant mass removal and plume persistence.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  The Impact of Well-Field Configuration on Contaminant Mass Removal and Plume Persistence for Homogeneous versus Layered Systems.

Authors:  Zhilin Guo; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Hydrol Process       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.565

4.  Cleanup of fractured rock aquifers. II. Effects of matrix diffusion and nonaqueous phase liquid.

Authors:  C Gómez-Lahoz; R G Delgado; J M Rodríguez Maroto; D J Wilson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Review: Groundwater flow and transport modeling of karst aquifers, with particular reference to the North Coast Limestone aquifer system of Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Reza Ghasemizadeh; Ferdinand Hellweger; Christoph Butscher; Ingrid Padilla; Dorothy Vesper; Malcolm Field; Akram Alshawabkeh
Journal:  Hydrogeol J       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.178

6.  Migration of pollutants in groundwater. VI. Flushing of DNAPL droplets/ganglia.

Authors:  S Kayano; D J Wilson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Matrix diffusion effects in the cleanup of heterogeneous aquifers.

Authors:  D J Wilson; R D Mutch; J I Scott
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Field, Laboratory and Modeling Evidence for Strong Attenuation of a Cr(VI) Plume in a Mudstone Aquifer Due to Matrix Diffusion and Reaction Processes.

Authors:  Steven Chapman; Beth Parker; Tom Al; Richard Wilkin; Diana Cutt; Katherine Mishkin; Shane Nelson
Journal:  Soil Syst       Date:  2021-03-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.