Literature DB >> 24222963

Quantification of pancreatic exocrine function of chronic pancreatitis with secretin-enhanced MRCP.

Yun Bian1, Li Wang, Chao Chen, Jian-Ping Lu, Jia-Bao Fan, Shi-Yue Chen, Bing-Hui Zhao.   

Abstract

AIM: To obtain reference values for pancreatic flow output rate (PFR) and peak time (PT) in healthy volunteers and chronic pancreatitis (CP); to correlate quantification of secretin enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (SMRCP) of pancreatic fluid output following secretin with fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) tests.
METHODS: The present study includes 53 subjects comprised of 17 healthy individuals and 36 patients with CP from April 2011 to January 2013. The 36 patients with CP were divided into three groups of mild CP (n = 14), moderate CP (n = 19) and advanced CP (n = 3) by M-ANNHEIM classification for CP.. Fifty-three cases underwent FE-1 test and magnetic resonance imaging using 3.0 T-device (Signa EXCITE, GE Healthcare). Coronal T2-weighted single-shot turbo spin-echo, spiratory triggered, covering the papillae, duodenum and small bowel. MRCP was performed with a heavily T2-weighted fat-suppressed long TE HASTE sequence (thick slab 2D MRCP sequence), repeated every 2 min up to 11 min after 0.1 mL/kg secretin injection (Secrelux, Sanochemia(®), Germany). FE-1 test used sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test (ScheBo. Tech(®), Germany).
RESULTS: A good linear correlation showed between the calculated volume and the actual volume by Phantom experiments. Fifty-three paired Quantification of secretin enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCPQ) and FE-1 data sets were analyzed. The mean FE-1 of 53 cases was 525.41 ± 94.44 μg/g for 17 healthy volunteers, 464.95 ± 136.13 μg/g for mild CP, 301.55 ± 181.55 μg/g for moderate CP, 229.30 ± 146.60 μg/g for advanced CP. Also, there was statistically significant difference in FE-1 (P = 0.0001) between health and CP. The mean values of PFR and PT were 8.18 ± 1.11 mL/min, 5.76 ± 1.71 min for normal; 7.27 ± 2.04 mL/min, 7.71 ± 2.55 min for mild CP; 4.98 ± 2.57 mL/min, 9.10 ± 3.00 min for moderate CP; 4.13 ± 1.83 mL/min, 12.33 ± 1.55 min for advanced CP. Further, statistically significant difference in PFR (P = 0.0001) and PT (P = 0.0001) was observed between health and CP. Besides, there was correlation (r = 0.79) and consistency (K = 0.6) between MRCPQ and ELISA Test. It was related between M-ANNHEIM classification and PFR (r = 0.55), FE-1 (r = 0.57).
CONCLUSION: SMRCP can provide a safe, non-invasive and efficient method to evaluate the exocrine function of the pancreas.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pancreatitis; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pancreatic exocrine function; Secretin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24222963      PMCID: PMC3819555          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  34 in total

1.  MR hydrometry to assess exocrine function of the pancreas: initial results of noninvasive quantification of secretion.

Authors:  J T Heverhagen; D Müller; A Battmann; N Ishaque; D Boehm; M Katschinski; H J Wagner; K J Klose
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of fecal elastase-1 and pancreatic function testing in children.

Authors:  Prateek D Wali; Beth Loveridge-Lenza; Zhaoping He; Karoly Horvath
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.839

3.  Magnetic resonance hydrometry: non-invasive quantification of the exocrine pancreatic function.

Authors:  J T Heverhagen; A Battmann; M Kirsch; D Boehm; R Eissele; K J Klose; H J Wagner
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-03

4.  Update on endoscopic pancreatic function testing.

Authors:  Tyler Stevens; Mansour A Parsi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Emotional valence and reference disturbance in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burbridge; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2002-02

6.  Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.

Authors:  Mari M Calvo; Luis Bujanda; Angel Calderón; Iñaki Heras; José L Cabriada; Antonio Bernal; Victor Orive; Elena Astigarraga
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Pancreatic cancer detection with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  H E Adamek; J Albert; H Breer; M Weitz; D Schilling; J F Riemann
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Fecal elastase-1 is useful in the detection of steatorrhea in patients with pancreatic diseases but not after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Luigi Benini; Antonio Amodio; Pietro Campagnola; Flora Agugiaro; Chiara Cristofori; Rocco Micciolo; Alessandra Magro; Armando Gabbrielli; Giulio Cabrini; Luisa Moser; Arianna Massella; Italo Vantini; Luca Frulloni
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 9.  MR imaging techniques for pancreas.

Authors:  Temel Tirkes; Christine O Menias; Kumaresan Sandrasegaran
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Assessment of exocrine pancreatic function by secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography and diffusion-weighted imaging in healthy controls.

Authors:  Gaute K Wathle; Erling Tjora; Lars Ersland; Georg Dimcevski; Øyvind O Salvesen; Anders Molven; Pål R Njølstad; Ingfrid S Haldorsen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  10 in total

1.  Secretin-Enhanced MRCP: How and Why-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jordan Swensson; Atif Zaheer; Darwin Conwell; Kumar Sandrasegaran; Riccardo Manfredi; Temel Tirkes
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatitis: an update.

Authors:  Sriluxayini Manikkavasakar; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Kiran K Busireddy; Miguel Ramalho; Viragi Nilmini; Madhavi Alagiyawanna; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Chronic Pancreatitis: A Review.

Authors:  A K Pujahari
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced MRI With Secretin-Stimulated MRCP for Non-Calcific Chronic Pancreatitis: A Comparison With Histopathology.

Authors:  Guru Trikudanathan; Sidney P Walker; Satish Munigala; Ben Spilseth; Ahmad Malli; Yusheng Han; Melena Bellin; Srinath Chinnakotla; Ty Dunn; Timothy L Pruett; Gregory J Beilman; Jose Vega Peralta; Mustafa A Arain; Stuart K Amateau; Sarah J Schwarzenberg; Shawn Mallery; Rajeev Attam; Martin L Freeman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Quantitative pancreatic MRI: a pathology-based review.

Authors:  Manil D Chouhan; Louisa Firmin; Samantha Read; Zahir Amin; Stuart A Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The Value of Secretin-Enhanced MRCP in Patients With Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Kumar Sandrasegaran; Bilal Tahir; Udaykamal Barad; Evan Fogel; Fatih Akisik; Temel Tirkes; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and characterization of solid pancreatic nodules: An update.

Authors:  Najwa Al Ansari; Miguel Ramalho; Richard C Semelka; Valeria Buonocore; Silvia Gigli; Francesca Maccioni
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28

8.  Turkish Gastroenterology Association, Pancreas Study Group, Chronic Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.

Authors:  Müjde Soytürk; Göksel Bengi; Dilek Oğuz; İsmail Hakkı Kalkan; Mehmet Yalnız; Mustafa Tahtacı; Kadir Demir; Elmas Kasap; Nevin Oruç; Nalan Gülşen Ünal; Orhan Sezgin; Osman Özdoğan; Engin Altıntaş; Serkan Yaraş; Erkan Parlak; Aydın Şeref Köksal; Murat Saruç; Hakan Ünal; Belkıs Ünsal; Süleyman Günay; Deniz Duman; Alper Yurçi; Sabite Kacar; Levent Filik
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.555

9.  Comparing acid steatocrit and faecal elastase estimations for use in M-ANNHEIM staging for pancreatitis.

Authors:  M Ganesh Kamath; C Ganesh Pai; Asha Kamath; Annamma Kurien
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Guidelines for the investigation of chronic diarrhoea in adults: British Society of Gastroenterology, 3rd edition.

Authors:  Ramesh P Arasaradnam; Steven Brown; Alastair Forbes; Mark R Fox; Pali Hungin; Lawrence Kelman; Giles Major; Michelle O'Connor; Dave S Sanders; Rakesh Sinha; Stephen Charles Smith; Paul Thomas; Julian R F Walters
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 23.059

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.