Literature DB >> 24222952

Magnifying endoscopy for the diagnosis of specialized intestinal metaplasia in short-segment Barrett's esophagus.

Nam Seok Ham1, Jae Young Jang, Sung Woo Ryu, Ji Hye Kim, Eui Ju Park, Woong Cheul Lee, Kwang Yeun Shim, Soung Won Jeong, Hyun Gun Kim, Tae Hee Lee, Sung Ran Jeon, Jun Hyung Cho, Joo Young Cho, So Young Jin, Ji Sung Lee.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether magnified observation of short-segment Barrett's esophagus (BE) is useful for the detection of specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM).
METHODS: Thirty patients with suspected short-segment BE underwent magnifying endoscopy up to × 80. The magnified images were analyzed with respect to their pit-patterns, which were simultaneously classified into five epithelial types [I (small round), II (straight), III (long oval), IV (tubular), V (villous)] by Endo's classification. Then, a 0.5% solution of methylene blue (MB) was sprayed over columnar mucosa. The patterns of the magnified image and MB staining were analyzed. Biopsies were obtained from the regions previously observed by magnifying endoscopy and MB chromoendoscopy.
RESULTS: Three of five patients with a type V (villous) epithelial pattern had SIM, whereas 21 patients with a non-type V epithelial patterns did not have SIM. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of pit-patterns in detecting SIM were 100%, 91.3%, 92.3%, 60% and 100%, respectively (P = 0.004). Three of the 12 patients with positive MB staining had SIM, whereas 14 patients with negative MB staining did not have SIM. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MB staining in detecting SIM were 100%, 60.9%, 65.4%, 25% and 100%, respectively (P = 0.085). The specificity and accuracy of pit-pattern evaluation were significantly superior compared with MB staining for detecting SIM by comparison with the exact McNemar's test (P = 0.0391).
CONCLUSION: The magnified observation of a short-segment BE according to the mucosal pattern and its classification can be predictive of SIM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett’s esophagus; Diagnosis; Dysplasia; Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Magnifying endoscopy; Methylene blue chromoendoscopy; Short-segment; Specialized intestinal metaplasia

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24222952      PMCID: PMC3819544          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  30 in total

1.  Magnification chromoendoscopy for the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  P Sharma; A P Weston; M Topalovski; R Cherian; A Bhattacharyya; R E Sampliner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Detection of intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus: an observational comparator study suggests the need for a minimum of eight biopsies.

Authors:  Rebecca Harrison; Ian Perry; William Haddadin; Stuart McDonald; Richard Bryan; Keith Abrams; Richard Sampliner; Nicholas J Talley; Paul Moayyedi; Janusz A Jankowski
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Barrett's esophagus: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Erin W Gilbert; Renato A Luna; Vincent L Harrison; John G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Advanced endoscopic imaging in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  L Max Almond; Hugh Barr
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  Enhanced magnification-directed biopsies do not increase the detection of intestinal metaplasia in patients with GERD.

Authors:  Dawn D Ferguson; Kenneth R DeVault; Murli Krishna; David S Loeb; Herbert C Wolfsen; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Effect of segment length on risk for neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett esophagus.

Authors:  R E Rudolph; T L Vaughan; B E Storer; R C Haggitt; P S Rabinovitch; D S Levine; B J Reid
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction and Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  A J Cameron; C T Lomboy; M Pera; H A Carpenter
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  A randomized comparison of methylene blue-directed biopsy versus conventional four-quadrant biopsy for the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  John David Horwhat; Corinne L Maydonovitch; Fernando Ramos; Ramon Colina; Erich Gaertner; Hyun Lee; Roy K H Wong
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Systematic four-quadrant biopsy detects Barrett's dysplasia in more patients than nonsystematic biopsy.

Authors:  Jo-Etienne Abela; James J Going; John F Mackenzie; Margaret McKernan; Sylvia O'Mahoney; Robert C Stuart
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Magnification endoscopy and chromoendoscopy in evaluation of specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Justyna Wasielica-Berger; Andrzej Baniukiewicz; Eugeniusz Wroblewski; Adam Chwiesko; Andrzej Dabrowski
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Magnus Halland; David Katzka; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.