Literature DB >> 18371135

Systematic four-quadrant biopsy detects Barrett's dysplasia in more patients than nonsystematic biopsy.

Jo-Etienne Abela1, James J Going, John F Mackenzie, Margaret McKernan, Sylvia O'Mahoney, Robert C Stuart.   

Abstract

AIMS: To compare detection of Barrett's dysplasia and adenocarcinoma by systematic versus nonsystematic surveillance biopsy protocols.
METHODS: Upper GI consultation and open-access endoscopy are provided jointly at Glasgow Royal Infirmary by medical and surgical teams. The surgical team adopted annual systematic four-quadrant biopsy Barrett's surveillance in 1995. The medical team continued annual Barrett's surveillance with nonsystematic biopsy until 2004. We compare detection of Barrett's dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma in unselected patients by these two biopsy strategies over 10 yr. All patients had > or = 3 cm Barrett's esophagus and histological proof of intestinal metaplasia. Patients referred for dysplasia management or with prevalent adenocarcinoma were excluded. Cohort A (N = 180) had four-quadrant biopsy every 2 cm while cohort B (N = 182) had nonsystematic biopsies.
RESULTS: Cohort A versus cohort B: Median number of biopsies per endoscopy: 16 versus 4. Prevalence of low-grade dysplasia (per patient): 18.9% versus 1.6% (P << 0.001). Prevalence of high-grade dysplasia: 2.8% versus 0% (P = 0.03). Incidence of low-grade dysplasia: 2.2% versus 6.6% (NS). Incidence of high-grade dysplasia: 2.8% versus 0% (P = 0.03). Nine cohort A patients (total 5%, 1.4% per patient-year) were treated for HGD (eight endoscopically, one by esophagectomy). Two had intramucosal adenocarcinoma. No cohort A patient developed advanced cancer but three cohort B patients developed and died of invasive Barrett's adenocarcinoma (0.6% per patient-year).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient age, gender, Barrett's segment length, and follow-up were similar (though not identical) in both cohorts, but confounding seems unlikely to account for a 13-fold difference in detection of prevalent dysplasia between the two groups. Our data support the hypothesis that systematic four-quadrant biopsy is considerably more effective than nonsystematic biopsy sampling in detecting Barrett's dysplasia and early adenocarcinoma. Greater biopsy numbers and the systematic pattern of biopsy taking may both contribute to this greater effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18371135     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01746.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  34 in total

1.  Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett's esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States.

Authors:  Julian A Abrams; Robert C Kapel; Guy M Lindberg; Mohammad H Saboorian; Robert M Genta; Alfred I Neugut; Charles J Lightdale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 2.  Barrett esophagus: histology and pathology for the clinician.

Authors:  Robert D Odze
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 3.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial Barrett's esophageal cancer in the Japanese state and perspective.

Authors:  Ryu Ishihara; Sachiko Yamamoto; Noboru Hanaoka; Yoji Takeuchi; Koji Higashino; Noriya Uedo; Hiroyasu Iishi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  Barrett's esophagus: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Swathi Eluri; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Raf Bisschops; Miguel Areia; Emmanuel Coron; Daniela Dobru; Bernd Kaskas; Roman Kuvaev; Oliver Pech; Krish Ragunath; Bas Weusten; Pietro Familiari; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Michal F Kaminski; Cristiano Spada; Michael Bretthauer; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Mário Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Improved detection of incident dysplasia by probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in a Barrett's esophagus surveillance program.

Authors:  Helga Bertani; Marzio Frazzoni; Emanuele Dabizzi; Flavia Pigò; Luisa Losi; Mauro Manno; Raffaele Manta; Gabrio Bassotti; Rita Conigliaro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Critical appraisal of guidelines for screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Spyridon Michopoulos
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

Review 8.  Screening and Prevention of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Oliver Pech
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-07-25

9.  Risk of metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: a multicenter retrospective study in a Japanese population.

Authors:  Ryu Ishihara; Tsuneo Oyama; Seiichiro Abe; Hiroaki Takahashi; Hiroyuki Ono; Junko Fujisaki; Mitsuru Kaise; Kenichi Goda; Kenro Kawada; Tomoyuki Koike; Manabu Takeuchi; Rie Matsuda; Dai Hirasawa; Masayoshi Yamada; Junichi Kodaira; Masaki Tanaka; Masami Omae; Akira Matsui; Takashi Kanesaka; Akiko Takahashi; Shinichi Hirooka; Masahiro Saito; Yosuke Tsuji; Yuki Maeda; Hiroharu Yamashita; Ichiro Oda; Yasuhiko Tomita; Takashi Matsunaga; Shuji Terai; Soji Ozawa; Tatsuyuki Kawano; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Barrett's esophagus: where do we stand?

Authors:  Majid A Al Madi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.