Literature DB >> 17970838

A randomized comparison of methylene blue-directed biopsy versus conventional four-quadrant biopsy for the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in patients with long-segment Barrett's esophagus.

John David Horwhat1, Corinne L Maydonovitch, Fernando Ramos, Ramon Colina, Erich Gaertner, Hyun Lee, Roy K H Wong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Methylene blue (MB) selectively stains specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) and may assist in surveying a columnar-lined esophagus for Barrett's esophagus associated dysplasia.
METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized crossover study comparing 4-quadrant random biopsies (4QB) versus MB-directed biopsies for the detection of SIM and dysplasia in 48 patients with long segment Barrett's esophagus (LSBE). Patients randomly underwent two endoscopies over a 4-wk time period with either 4QB or MB-directed biopsies as their first or second exam. Our aim was to correlate stain intensity with histology.
RESULTS: The sensitivity of MB for SIM and dysplasia was 75.2% and 83.1%, respectively. The yield of 4QB for identifying nondysplasia SIM was 57.6% (523/917) and for dysplasia was 12% (111/917). Dark staining was significantly associated with histologic grade (P < 0.007). The final diagnosis was correct in 43 (90%) patients using MB and in 45 (94%) using 4QB. The 4QB technique missed dysplasia in 3 of 21 patients while MB biopsies missed dysplasia in 5 of 21 patients. The discordance between the two techniques was not significant (P= 0.727, McNemar's test). The mean number of biopsies taken during 4QB was 18.92 +/- 6.36 and with MB was 9.23 +/- 2.89 (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: MB requires significantly fewer biopsies than 4QB to evaluate for SIM and dysplasia. Dark staining correlates more with HGD than LGD in our experience. While MB is not more accurate than 4QB, MB may help to define areas to target for biopsy during surveillance endoscopy in patients with LSBE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17970838     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01601.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  17 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced endoscopic imaging and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Rupa Banerjee; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-19

Review 2.  Screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jeff Michalak; Ajay Bansal; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2009-06

Review 3.  Barrett esophagus: histology and pathology for the clinician.

Authors:  Robert D Odze
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; Prateek Sharma; Rhonda F Souza; John M Inadomi; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Endoscopic evaluation and advanced imaging of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Kenneth K Wang; Ngozi Okoro; Ganapathy Prasad; Michel WongKeeSong; Navtej S Buttar; Jianmin Tian
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2011-01

Review 6.  Advanced imaging technologies increase detection of dysplasia and neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Bashar J Qumseya; Haibo Wang; Nicole Badie; Rosemary N Uzomba; Sravanthi Parasa; Donna L White; Herbert Wolfsen; Prateek Sharma; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  Barrett's esophagus: where do we stand?

Authors:  Majid A Al Madi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

Review 8.  Management of Barrett's esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Miyazaki; Takanori Inose; Naritaka Tanaka; Takehiko Yokobori; Shigemasa Suzuki; Daigo Ozawa; Makoto Sohda; Masanobu Nakajima; Minoru Fukuchi; Hiroyuki Kato; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Barrett's esophagus: A review of diagnostic criteria, clinical surveillance practices and new developments.

Authors:  Cassie L Booth; Kevin S Thompson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-09

10.  Magnifying endoscopy for the diagnosis of specialized intestinal metaplasia in short-segment Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Nam Seok Ham; Jae Young Jang; Sung Woo Ryu; Ji Hye Kim; Eui Ju Park; Woong Cheul Lee; Kwang Yeun Shim; Soung Won Jeong; Hyun Gun Kim; Tae Hee Lee; Sung Ran Jeon; Jun Hyung Cho; Joo Young Cho; So Young Jin; Ji Sung Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.