Literature DB >> 10824077

The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators.

J G Canto1, N R Every, D J Magid, W J Rogers, J A Malmgren, P D Frederick, W J French, A J Tiefenbrunn, V K Misra, C I Kiefe, H V Barron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an inverse relation between mortality from cardiovascular causes and the number of elective cardiac procedures (coronary angioplasty, stenting, or coronary bypass surgery) performed by individual practitioners or hospitals. However, it is not known whether patients with acute myocardial infarction fare better at centers where more patients undergo primary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy than at centers with lower volumes.
METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction to determine the relation between the number of patients receiving reperfusion therapy (primary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy) and subsequent in-hospital mortality. A total of 450 hospitals were divided into quartiles according to the volume of primary angioplasty. Multiple logistic-regression models were used to determine whether the volume of primary angioplasty procedures was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing this procedure. Similar analyses were performed for patients receiving thrombolytic therapy at 516 hospitals.
RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 28 percent lower among patients who underwent primary angioplasty at hospitals with the highest volume than among those who underwent angioplasty at hospitals with the lowest volume (adjusted relative risk, 0.72; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.87; P<0.001). This lower rate, which represented 2.0 fewer deaths per 100 patients treated, was independent of the total volume of patients with myocardial infarction at each hospital, year of admission, and use or nonuse of adjunctive pharmacologic therapies. There was no significant relation between the volume of thrombolytic interventions and in-hospital mortality among patients who received thrombolytic therapy (7.0 percent for patients in the highest-volume hospitals vs. 6.9 percent for those in the lowest-volume hospitals, P=0.36).
CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitals in the United States that have full interventional capabilities, a higher volume of angioplasty procedures is associated with a lower mortality rate among patients undergoing primary angioplasty, but there is no association between volume and mortality for thrombolytic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10824077     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200005253422106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  58 in total

Review 1.  Acute myocardial infarction: primary angioplasty.

Authors:  F Zijlstra
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A case study of hospital closure and centralization of coronary revascularization procedures.

Authors:  B R Hemmelgarn; W A Ghali; H Quan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Assessment of the interventional neuroradiology workforce in the United States: a review of the existing data.

Authors:  Harry J Cloft; Thomas A Tomsick; David F Kallmes; Jonas H Goldstein; John J Connors
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Long term outcome and cost-effectiveness of stenting versus balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Suryapranata; J P Ottervanger; E Nibbering; A W van 't Hof; J C Hoorntje; M J de Boer; M J Al; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Transport and centralization of acute coronary syndrome care.

Authors:  James L Orford; Peter B Berger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Global registries for measuring pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life outcomes: focus on design and data collection, analysis and interpretation.

Authors:  Lisa Kennedy; Ann-Marie Craig
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Access to cardiac interventional services in Alabama and Mississippi: a geographical information system analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Ann Graves
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2010-04-01

8.  Decreased mortality resulting from a multicomponent intervention in a tertiary care medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Giora Netzer; Xinggang Liu; Carl Shanholtz; Anthony Harris; Avelino Verceles; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Expedited transfer for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a program evaluation.

Authors:  Jacobus S de Villiers; Todd Anderson; James D McMeekin; Raymond C M Leung; Mouhieddin Traboulsi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Regionalization of ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes care: putting a national policy in proper perspective.

Authors:  Saif S Rathore; Andrew J Epstein; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.