Literature DB >> 24221697

[Value of new MR techniques in MR-PET].

U I Attenberger1, H H Quick, A Guimaraes, O Catalano, J N Morelli, S O Schoenberg.   

Abstract

The unparalleled soft tissue contrast of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the functional information obtainable with 18-F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) render MR-PET well-suited for oncological and psychiatric imaging. The lack of ionizing radiation with MRI also makes MR-PET a promising modality for oncology patients requiring frequent follow-up and pediatric patients. Lessons learned with PET computed tomography (CT) over the last few years do not directly translate to MR-PET. For example, in PET-CT the Hounsfield units derived from CT are used for attenuation correction (AC). As 511 keV photons emitted in PET examinations are attenuated by the patient's body CT data are converted directly to linear attenuation coefficients (LAC); however, proton density measured by MRI is not directly related to the radiodensity or LACs of biological tissue. Thus, direct conversion to LAC data is not possible making AC more challenging in simultaneous MRI-PET scanning. In addition to these constraints simultaneous MRI-PET acquisitions also improve on some solutions to well-known challenges of hybrid imaging techniques, such as limitations in motion correction. This article reports on initial clinical experiences with simultaneously acquired MRI-PET data, focusing on the potential benefits and limitations of MRI with respect to motion correction as well as metal and attenuation correction artefacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24221697     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-013-2559-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  38 in total

1.  MRI-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET/MRI systems: a 4-class tissue segmentation technique using a combined ultrashort-echo-time/Dixon MRI sequence.

Authors:  Yannick Berker; Jochen Franke; André Salomon; Moritz Palmowski; Henk C W Donker; Yavuz Temur; Felix M Mottaghy; Christiane Kuhl; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Zahi A Fayad; Fabian Kiessling; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  A complete distortion correction for MR images: II. Rectification of static-field inhomogeneities by similarity-based profile mapping.

Authors:  Stefan A Reinsberg; Simon J Doran; Elizabeth M Charles-Edwards; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A complete distortion correction for MR images: I. Gradient warp correction.

Authors:  Simon J Doran; Liz Charles-Edwards; Stefan A Reinsberg; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  The effect of MR surface coils on PET quantification in whole-body PET/MR: results from a pseudo-PET/MR phantom study.

Authors:  L Tellmann; H H Quick; A Bockisch; H Herzog; T Beyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Image artifacts from MR-based attenuation correction in clinical, whole-body PET/MRI.

Authors:  Sune H Keller; Søren Holm; Adam E Hansen; Bernhard Sattler; Flemming Andersen; Thomas L Klausen; Liselotte Højgaard; Andreas Kjær; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  MR imaging of motion with spatial modulation of magnetization.

Authors:  L Axel; L Dougherty
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Heart wall motion: improved method of spatial modulation of magnetization for MR imaging.

Authors:  L Axel; L Dougherty
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Whole-body MR imaging: evaluation of patients for metastases.

Authors:  Thomas C Lauenstein; Susanne C Goehde; Christoph U Herborn; Matthias Goyen; Carsten Oberhoff; Jörg F Debatin; Stefan G Ruehm; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  MR-based field-of-view extension in MR/PET: B0 homogenization using gradient enhancement (HUGE).

Authors:  Jan O Blumhagen; Ralf Ladebeck; Matthias Fenchel; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance-based motion correction for positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  Jinsong Ouyang; Quanzheng Li; Georges El Fakhri
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.