Literature DB >> 24221116

Somaclonal variation in tomato: effect of explant source and a comparison with chemical mutagenesis.

R W van den Bulk1, H J Löffler, W H Lindhout, M Koornneef.   

Abstract

Plants were regenerated from leaf, cotyledon, and hypocotyl explants of tomato cv Moneymaker. Various phenotypic alterations were observed among regenerated plants (R1), but were not transmitted to the progenies, except for ploidy variation. Variation in ploidy level, mainly tetraploidy, occurred in R1 plants and their R2 progenies, and the frequency of polyploid plants depended on the explant source. More than 50% of the regenerants derived from hypocotyl explants were found to be polyploid. A correlation was observed between the percentage of polyploid cells present in the explant material in vivo and the frequency of polyploid plants. Several monogenic mutations were recovered in the R2, four of which were shown to be allelic to known, recessive, single-gene mutants. No significant effect of explant source or duration of tissue culture period on mutant frequency or spectrum was found. For several mutant types that could be scored unambiguously, somaclonal variation was compared to variation induced by treatment of seeds with ethyl methane sulphonate (EMS). The results showed that the mutant frequencies were higher after EMS treatment than those generated through tissue culture. With respect to the mutant spectrum, no clear differences were observed between the spectra obtained after EMS treatment and those after tissue culture. However, tissue culture gave rise to polyploid plants, whereas no ploidy variants occurred after EMS treatment.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 24221116     DOI: 10.1007/BF00224199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  8 in total

1.  Somaclonal variation - a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement.

Authors:  P J Larkin; W R Scowcroft
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Flow cytometric analysis of polysomaty and in vitro genetic instability in potato.

Authors:  K S Ramulu; P Dijkhuis
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.570

3.  Abnormal stomatal behavior and root resistance, and hormonal imbalance in three wilty mutants of tomato.

Authors:  M Tal; Y Nevo
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  Flow cytometric and karyological analysis of polysomaty and polyploidization during callus formation from leaf segments of various potato genotypes.

Authors:  L P Pijnacker; K Sree Ramulu; P Dijkhuis; M A Ferwerda
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Single gene mutations in tomato plants regenerated from tissue culture.

Authors:  D A Evans; W R Sharp
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A single dominant gene for Fusarium wilt resistance in protoplast-derived tomato plants.

Authors:  E A Shahin; R Spivey
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Somaclonal variation versus chemically induced mutagenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.).

Authors:  G Gavazzi; C Tonelli; G Todesco; E Arreghini; F Raffaldi; F Vecchio; G Barbuzzi; M G Biasini; F Sala
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Examination of genome stability in cultured Lycopersicon.

Authors:  M A O'Connell; L P Hosticka; M R Hanson
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.570

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Culture-induced variation in plants of Coffea arabica cv. caturra rojo, regenerated by direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis.

Authors:  L Felipe Sanchez-Teyer; Francisco Quiroz-Figueroa; Victor Loyola-Vargas; Diogenes Infante
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Identification of highly polymorphic DNA regions in tomato.

Authors:  B Vosman; P Arens; W Rus-Kortekaas; M J Smulders
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Tissue culture-induced DNA methylation polymorphisms in repetitive DNA of tomato calli and regenerated plants.

Authors:  M J Smulders; W Rus-Kortekaas; B Vosman
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Factors influencing transformation frequency of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum).

Authors:  J S van Roekel; B Damm; L S Melchers; A Hoekema
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  Responses to NaCl stress of cultivated and wild tomato species and their hybrids in callus cultures.

Authors:  E A Cano; F Pérez-Alfocea; V Moreno; M C Bolarin
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  Generation of a Collection of Mutant Tomato Lines Using Pooled CRISPR Libraries.

Authors:  Thomas B Jacobs; Ning Zhang; Dhruv Patel; Gregory B Martin
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  An efficient mannose selection protocol for tomato that has no adverse effect on the ploidy level of transgenic plants.

Authors:  Marina Sigareva; Rody Spivey; Michael G Willits; Catherine M Kramer; Yin-Fu Chang
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 4.570

8.  Isolation of a new paramutagenic allele of thesulfurea locus in the tomato cultivar Moneymaker following in vitro culture.

Authors:  E Wisman; M S Ramanna; M Koornneef
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Easy determination of ploidy level in Arabidopsis thaliana plants by means of pollen size measurement.

Authors:  T Altmann; B Damm; W B Frommer; T Martin; P C Morris; D Schweizer; L Willmitzer; R Schmidt
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  Occurrence of tetraploidy in Nicotiana attenuata plants after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is genotype specific but independent of polysomaty of explant tissue.

Authors:  Ben Bubner; Klaus Gase; Beatrice Berger; Dirk Link; Ian T Baldwin
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 4.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.