Literature DB >> 24219314

The malleability of working memory and visuospatial skills: a randomized controlled study in older adults.

Hana Stepankova1, Jiri Lukavsky1, Martin Buschkuehl2, Miloslav Kopecek1, Daniela Ripova1, Susanne M Jaeggi2.   

Abstract

There is accumulating evidence that training on working memory (WM) generalizes to other nontrained domains, and there are reports of transfer effects extending as far as to measures of fluid intelligence. Although there have been several demonstrations of such transfer effects in young adults and children, they have been difficult to demonstrate in older adults. In this study, we investigated the generalizing effects of an adaptive WM intervention on nontrained measures of WM and visuospatial skills. We randomly assigned healthy older adults to train on a verbal n-back task over the course of a month for either 10 or 20 sessions. Their performance change was compared with that of a control group. Our results revealed reliable group effects in nontrained standard clinical measures of WM and visuospatial skills in that both training groups outperformed the control group. We also observed a dose-response effect, that is, a positive relationship between training frequency and the gain in visuospatial skills; this finding was further confirmed by a positive correlation between training improvement and transfer. The improvements in visuospatial skills emerged even though the intervention was restricted to the verbal domain. Our work has important implications in that our data provide further evidence for plasticity of cognitive functions in old age. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24219314     DOI: 10.1037/a0034913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Psychol        ISSN: 0012-1649


  36 in total

1.  Do We Really Become Smarter When Our Fluid-Intelligence Test Scores Improve?

Authors:  Taylor R Hayes; Alexander A Petrov; Per B Sederberg
Journal:  Intelligence       Date:  2015-01

2.  There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is effective: A reply to Au et al. (2014) and Karbach and Verhaeghen (2014).

Authors:  Monica Melby-Lervåg; Charles Hulme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

3.  Does working memory training have to be adaptive?

Authors:  Claudia C von Bastian; Anne Eschen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-02-26

4.  Investigating the Effects of Spacing on Working Memory Training Outcome: A Randomized, Controlled, Multisite Trial in Older Adults.

Authors:  Susanne M Jaeggi; Martin Buschkuehl; Chelsea M Parlett-Pelleriti; Seung Min Moon; Michelle Evans; Alexandra Kritzmacher; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Priti Shah; John Jonides
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies.

Authors:  Anna Soveri; Jan Antfolk; Linda Karlsson; Benny Salo; Matti Laine
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

6.  Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jacky Au; Ellen Sheehan; Nancy Tsai; Greg J Duncan; Martin Buschkuehl; Susanne M Jaeggi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

Review 7.  Cognitive training as a component of treatment of alcohol use disorder: A review.

Authors:  Sara Jo Nixon; Ben Lewis
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Cognitive Interventions for Cognitively Healthy, Mildly Impaired, and Mixed Samples of Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Catherine M Mewborn; Cutter A Lindbergh; L Stephen Miller
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 7.444

9.  Home-based Cognitive Prehabilitation in Older Surgical Patients: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Phillip E Vlisides; Abhijit R Das; Allie M Thompson; Bryan Kunkler; Mackenzie Zierau; Michael J Cantley; Amy M McKinney; Bruno Giordani
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.956

10.  How to interpret cognitive training studies: A reply to Lindskog & Winman.

Authors:  Joonkoo Park; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.