PURPOSE: Efforts to better understand the impact of clinic member relationships on care quality in primary care clinics have been limited by the absence of a validated instrument to assess these relationships. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a scale assessing relationships within primary care clinics. METHODS: The Work Relationships Scale (WRS) was developed and administered as part of a survey of learning and relationships among 17 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics. A Rasch partial-credit model and principal components analysis were used to evaluate item performance, select the final items for inclusion, and establish unidimensionality for the WRS. The WRS was then validated against semistructured clinic member interviews and VA Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) data. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-seven clinicians and staff completed the clinic survey, and 247 participated in semistructured interviews. WRS scores were significantly associated with clinic-level reporting for 2 SHEP variables: overall rating of personal doctor/nurse (r(2) =0.43, P <.01) and overall rating of health care (r(2)= 0.25, P <.05). Interview data describing relationship characteristics were consistent with variability in WRS scores across low-scoring and high-scoring clinics. CONCLUSIONS: The WRS shows promising validity as a measure assessing the quality of relationships in primary care settings; moreover, primary care clinics with lower WRS scores received poorer patient quality ratings for both individual clinicians and overall health care. Relationships play an important role in shaping care delivery and should be assessed as part of efforts to improve patient care within primary care settings.
PURPOSE: Efforts to better understand the impact of clinic member relationships on care quality in primary care clinics have been limited by the absence of a validated instrument to assess these relationships. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a scale assessing relationships within primary care clinics. METHODS: The Work Relationships Scale (WRS) was developed and administered as part of a survey of learning and relationships among 17 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics. A Rasch partial-credit model and principal components analysis were used to evaluate item performance, select the final items for inclusion, and establish unidimensionality for the WRS. The WRS was then validated against semistructured clinic member interviews and VA Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) data. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty-seven clinicians and staff completed the clinic survey, and 247 participated in semistructured interviews. WRS scores were significantly associated with clinic-level reporting for 2 SHEP variables: overall rating of personal doctor/nurse (r(2) =0.43, P <.01) and overall rating of health care (r(2)= 0.25, P <.05). Interview data describing relationship characteristics were consistent with variability in WRS scores across low-scoring and high-scoring clinics. CONCLUSIONS: The WRS shows promising validity as a measure assessing the quality of relationships in primary care settings; moreover, primary care clinics with lower WRS scores received poorer patient quality ratings for both individual clinicians and overall health care. Relationships play an important role in shaping care delivery and should be assessed as part of efforts to improve patient care within primary care settings.
Authors: Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; A John Orzano; Paul A Nutting; W Perry Dickinson; Jill Scott-Cawiezell; Karissa Hahn; Michelle Gibel; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Truls Østbye; Kimberly S H Yarnall; Katrina M Krause; Kathryn I Pollak; Margaret Gradison; J Lloyd Michener Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Marlon P Mundt; Valerie J Gilchrist; Michael F Fleming; Larissa I Zakletskaia; Wen-Jan Tuan; John W Beasley Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Erin P Finley; Hector A Garcia; Norma S Ketchum; Donald D McGeary; Cindy A McGeary; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Alan L Peterson Journal: Psychol Serv Date: 2014-11-24
Authors: Rachel Gold; Celine Hollombe; Arwen Bunce; Christine Nelson; James V Davis; Stuart Cowburn; Nancy Perrin; Jennifer DeVoe; Ned Mossman; Bruce Boles; Michael Horberg; James W Dearing; Victoria Jaworski; Deborah Cohen; David Smith Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2015-10-16 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Mary Jo Pugh; Luci K Leykum; Holly J Lanham; Erin P Finley; Polly H Noël; Katharine K McMillan; Jacqueline A Pugh Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Luci K Leykum; Holly J Lanham; Jacqueline A Pugh; Michael Parchman; Ruth A Anderson; Benjamin F Crabtree; Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Kurt C Stange; Reuben R McDaniel Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 7.327