Literature DB >> 24214753

Stimulus selection and memory strategies in concept problems.

L E Bourne1.   

Abstract

Ss were allowed to use zero, one, two, four, or eight markers to signify the category (positive or negative) of previously selected stimuli in an attribute identification problem. The more markers available and used, the fewer trials were required for problem solution. Ss were indifferent to marker valence (positive or negative) in disjunctive problems but showed a definite preference for (the more informative) negative markers in conditionals. Performance of Ss was correlated with their tendency to move markers from lesser to more informative instances. An interpretation of results based on individual differences in information processing activities is suggested.

Year:  1974        PMID: 24214753     DOI: 10.3758/BF03208994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  7 in total

1.  CONCEPT LEARNING AS A FUNCTION OF AVAILABILITY OF PREVIOUSLY PRESENTED INFORMATION.

Authors:  L E BOURNE; S GOLDSTEIN; W E LINK
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1964-05

2.  NUMBER AND TYPE OF AVAILABLE INSTANCES IN CONCEPT LEARNING.

Authors:  V PISHKIN; A WOLFGANG
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-01

3.  Hierarchies in concept attainment.

Authors:  U NEISSER; P WEENE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-12

4.  A communication analysis of concept learning.

Authors:  C I HOVLAND
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Focusing strategy for eight concept rules.

Authors:  P R Laughlin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-08

6.  Learning conceptual rules. II. The role of positive and negative instances.

Authors:  L E Bourne; D E Guy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

7.  Hypothesis behavior by humans during discrimination learning.

Authors:  M Levine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.