Literature DB >> 23750376

Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation.

S W Gangestad1, J A Simpson.   

Abstract

Considerable progress has been made in behavioral genetics toward providing theoretical accounts of individual differences. One theoretical ask, however, has been largely neglected—that of constructing evolutionary accounts of behaviorally relevant genetic variance. We attempt to address this ask with respect to the genetic variance underlying sociosexuality, that is, the differences in the implicit prerequisites (in terms of time, attachment, commitment, etc.) to entering a sexual relationship. Specifically, we argue that genetic variance on this trait for females could have been maintained through frequency-dependent selection. In our evolutionary past, restricted females—those who require relatively more time, attachment, and commitment—could have benefited through paternal investment in their offspring. Unrestricted females—those who require relatively less time, attachment, and commitment—could have benefited through the quality of their mate's genes passed onto their sons. Moreover, the value of these alternate "strategies" could have been frequency-dependent. One prediction that follows from this evolutionary history is tested and supported in three studies. Those females genetically predisposed to be unrestricted are found to produce relatively more sons than females predisposed to be restricted. Additional predictions are offered and alternative accounts are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 23750376     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00908.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers        ISSN: 0022-3506


  19 in total

1.  Estrogens and relationship jealousy.

Authors:  D C Geary; M C DeSoto; M K Hoard; M S Sheldon; M L Cooper
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2001-12

2.  Male sexual strategies modify ratings of female models with specific waist-to-hip ratios.

Authors:  Gary L Brase; Gary Walker
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2004-06

3.  Birth order and relationships : Family, friends, and sexual partners.

Authors:  Catherine Salmon
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2003-03

4.  The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire.

Authors:  Graham Albert; George B Richardson; Steven Arnocky; Zeynep Senveli; Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-08-24

5.  Sex without emotional involvement: an evolutionary interpretation of sex differences.

Authors:  J M Townsend
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1995-04

Review 6.  Mate preferences and infectious disease: theoretical considerations and evidence in humans.

Authors:  Joshua M Tybur; Steven W Gangestad
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Trade-offs in low-income women's mate preferences : Within-sex differences in reproductive strategy.

Authors:  Jacob M Vigil; David C Geary; Jennifer Byrd-Craven
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2006-09

8.  The Morning after the Night Before : Affective Reactions to One-Night Stands among Mated and Unmated Women and Men.

Authors:  Anne Campbell
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2008-04-19

9.  Relationships between the human sex ratio and the woman's microenvironment : Four tests.

Authors:  W C Mackey
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-06

10.  Sexual selection and physical attractiveness : Implications for mating dynamics.

Authors:  S W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.