Literature DB >> 22941269

Sex and age differences in mate-selection preferences.

Sascha Schwarz1, Manfred Hassebrauck.   

Abstract

For nearly 70 years, studies have shown large sex differences in human mate selection preferences. However, most of the studies were restricted to a limited set of mate selection criteria and to college students, and neglecting relationship status. In this study, 21,245 heterosexual participants between 18 and 65 years of age (mean age 41) who at the time were not involved in a close relationship rated the importance of 82 mate selection criteria adapted from previous studies, reported age ranges for the oldest and youngest partner that they would find acceptable, and responded to 10 yes/no questions about a potential marriage partner. For nearly all mate selection criteria, women were found to be the more demanding sex, although men placed consistently more value on the physical attractiveness of a potential partner than women. Also, the effects of the participants' age and level of education were nearly negligible. These results demonstrate the robustness of sex differences in mate selection criteria across a substantial age range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941269     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-012-9152-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  13 in total

1.  Ideals in intimate relationships.

Authors:  G J Fletcher; J A Simpson; G Thomas; L Giles
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-01

2.  Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maike Luhmann; Wilhelm Hofmann; Michael Eid; Richard E Lucas
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-11-07

3.  Sex and generational differences in desired characteristics in mate selection.

Authors:  Jael Amador; Tanya Charles; Jairus Tait; Herbert W Helm
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2005-02

4.  Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.

Authors:  Norman P Li; Douglas T Kenrick
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-03

5.  Sexual selection and physical attractiveness : Implications for mating dynamics.

Authors:  S W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

6.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample.

Authors:  S Sprecher; Q Sullivan; E Hatfield
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-06

8.  Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model.

Authors:  A Feingold
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs.

Authors:  Norman P Li; J Michael Bailey; Douglas T Kenrick; Joan A W Linsenmeier
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-06

10.  The effects of control of resources on magnitudes of sex differences in human mate preferences.

Authors:  Fhionna Moore; Clare Cassidy; David I Perrett
Journal:  Evol Psychol       Date:  2010-12-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Facial Features: What Women Perceive as Attractive and What Men Consider Attractive.

Authors:  José Antonio Muñoz-Reyes; Marta Iglesias-Julios; Miguel Pita; Enrique Turiegano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.