PURPOSE: We have monitored retinal function in patients treated for retinoblastoma (primarily, but not exclusively by intra-arterial chemotherapy infusion) by electroretinography (ERG) recordings for the past 7 years. We here present data from 599 ERG studies of 108 patients, in which a complete ERG protocol including both photopic and scotopic recordings was performed, in justification of our frequent practice of reporting primarily 30-Hz photopic flicker amplitude data. METHODS: Patients referred for treatment of retinoblastoma underwent ERG recordings during examination under anesthesia whenever possible: at baseline and following most treatment sessions. Correlations were calculated for the complete datasets between the four primary amplitude response parameters: photopic single flash b-wave, photopic 30-Hz flicker peak-to-trough, scotopic rod-isolating b-wave, and scotopic maximal flash b-wave. RESULTS: Using our adaptation of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision-recommended standard ERG protocol, ERG responses of eyes of patients with untreated retinoblastoma or following traditional or intra-arterial treatment for retinoblastoma show very high correlations between 30-Hz flicker amplitude responses and three other standard photopic and scotopic ERG response amplitudes. Reductions in ERG amplitudes seen in these eyes following treatment show no significant difference between retinal dysfunction estimated using rod- or cone-dominated responses. CONCLUSION: These observations support the use of photopic response amplitudes (especially in response to 30-Hz flicker) as the primary ERG outcome measure in studies of treated and untreated eyes with retinoblastoma when more complete ERG protocols may be impractical.
PURPOSE: We have monitored retinal function in patients treated for retinoblastoma (primarily, but not exclusively by intra-arterial chemotherapy infusion) by electroretinography (ERG) recordings for the past 7 years. We here present data from 599 ERG studies of 108 patients, in which a complete ERG protocol including both photopic and scotopic recordings was performed, in justification of our frequent practice of reporting primarily 30-Hz photopic flicker amplitude data. METHODS:Patients referred for treatment of retinoblastoma underwent ERG recordings during examination under anesthesia whenever possible: at baseline and following most treatment sessions. Correlations were calculated for the complete datasets between the four primary amplitude response parameters: photopic single flash b-wave, photopic 30-Hz flicker peak-to-trough, scotopic rod-isolating b-wave, and scotopic maximal flash b-wave. RESULTS: Using our adaptation of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision-recommended standard ERG protocol, ERG responses of eyes of patients with untreated retinoblastoma or following traditional or intra-arterial treatment for retinoblastoma show very high correlations between 30-Hz flicker amplitude responses and three other standard photopic and scotopic ERG response amplitudes. Reductions in ERG amplitudes seen in these eyes following treatment show no significant difference between retinal dysfunction estimated using rod- or cone-dominated responses. CONCLUSION: These observations support the use of photopic response amplitudes (especially in response to 30-Hz flicker) as the primary ERG outcome measure in studies of treated and untreated eyes with retinoblastoma when more complete ERG protocols may be impractical.
Authors: Scott E Brodie; Francis L Munier; Jasmine H Francis; Brian Marr; Y Pierre Gobin; David H Abramson Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Danielle Novetsky Friedman; Charles A Sklar; Kevin C Oeffinger; Nancy A Kernan; Yasmin Khakoo; Brian P Marr; Suzanne L Wolden; David H Abramson; Ira J Dunkel Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: David H Abramson; Jasmine H Francis; Ira J Dunkel; Brian P Marr; Scott E Brodie; Y Pierre Gobin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jasmine H Francis; Scott E Brodie; Brian Marr; Emily C Zabor; Ijah Mondesire-Crump; David H Abramson Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Aliaa H Abdelhakim; Jasmine H Francis; Brian P Marr; Y Pierre Gobin; David H Abramson; Scott E Brodie Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Rachel C Brennan; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Shenghua Mao; Jianrong Wu; Catherine A Billups; Clinton F Stewart; Mary Ellen Hoehn; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Matthew W Wilson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carley M Bogan; Janene M Pierce; Stephanie D Doss; Yuankai K Tao; Sheau-Chiann Chen; Kelli L Boyd; Albert Liao; Terry Hsieh; David H Abramson; Jasmine H Francis; Debra L Friedman; Ann Richmond; Anthony B Daniels Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Lucy V Cobbs; Jasmine H Francis; Ira J Dunkel; Y Pierre Gobin; Scott E Brodie; David H Abramson Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: Jasmine H Francis; Nelli Roosipu; Ariana M Levin; Scott E Brodie; Ira J Dunkel; Y Pierre Gobin; David H Abramson Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Jasmine H Francis; David H Abramson; Y Pierre Gobin; Brian P Marr; Ira J Dunkel; Elyn R Riedel; Scott E Brodie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David H Abramson; Brian P Marr; Jasmine H Francis; Ira J Dunkel; Armida W M Fabius; Scott E Brodie; Ijah Mondesire-Crump; Y Pierre Gobin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carley M Bogan; Jessica V Kaczmarek; Janene M Pierce; Sheau-Chiann Chen; Kelli L Boyd; Marion W Calcutt; Thomas M Bridges; Craig W Lindsley; Jennifer B Nadelmann; Albert Liao; Terry Hsieh; David H Abramson; Jasmine H Francis; Debra L Friedman; Ann Richmond; Anthony B Daniels Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.638