Literature DB >> 1584569

Combined amplitude and phase criteria for evaluation of macular electroretinograms.

S E Brodie1, E M Naidu, J Goncalves.   

Abstract

Focal electroretinograms (ERGs) were obtained from 35 normal eyes and 48 eyes with known macular disease using the MaculoScope stimulator-ophthalmoscope instrument. Response amplitude and phase were combined to permit interpretation of the ERG responses as two-dimensional vectors. This vector interpretation avoids statistical anomalies and distortions inherent in the use of amplitude and phase response parameters. Furthermore, the vector interpretation permits the use of the Hotelling T2 statistic for the assessment of the significance of the differences between ERG responses, providing greater statistical power than simultaneous comparison of amplitude and phase data separately. The distribution of normal responses yielded limiting normal values of 135 nV for the amplitude and -95 degrees for the phase lag of the focal ERG as recorded by the MaculoScope instrument. Significant abnormalities of the focal ERG are illustrated for cases of cilioretinal artery occlusion, Stargardt's disease, idiopathic macular hole, diabetic macular edema, and idiopathic macular dysfunction with normal fundus. This study demonstrates the potential value of the focal ERG in the demonstration of macular disease undetectable by conventional electroretinography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1584569     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31938-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  4 in total

1.  Effect of spatial frequency of stimulus on focal macular ERGs in monkeys : fmacERG dependence on the spatial-frequency.

Authors:  Kisaburo Yamada; Celso Soiti Matsumoto; Kazuo Nakatsuka
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Non-selectivity of ERG reductions in eyes treated for retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Catherine Y Liu; Gowtham Jonna; Jasmine H Francis; Brian P Marr; David H Abramson; Scott E Brodie
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Next Generation PERG Method: Expanding the Response Dynamic Range and Capturing Response Adaptation.

Authors:  Pedro Monsalve; Giacinto Triolo; Jonathon Toft-Nielsen; Jorge Bohorquez; Amanda D Henderson; Rafael Delgado; Edward Miskiel; Ozcan Ozdamar; William J Feuer; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 4.  Neuroinflammatory responses in diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Ying Yu; Hui Chen; Shao Bo Su
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 8.322

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.