Literature DB >> 32442300

Metaphase cytogenetics and plasma cell proliferation index for risk stratification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Patrick W Mellors1, Moritz Binder2, Rhett P Ketterling3, Patricia T Greipp3, Linda B Baughn3, Jess F Peterson3, Dragan Jevremovic3, Kathryn E Pearce3, Francis K Buadi2, Martha Q Lacy2, Morie A Gertz2, Angela Dispenzieri2, Suzanne R Hayman2, Prashant Kapoor2, Wilson I Gonsalves2, Yi L Hwa2, Amie Fonder2, Miriam Hobbs2, Taxiarchis Kourelis2, Rahma Warsame2, John A Lust2, Nelson Leung2, Ronald S Go2, Robert A Kyle2, S Vincent Rajkumar2, Shaji K Kumar2.   

Abstract

Metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities, plasma cell proliferation index (PCPro), and gain 1q by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are associated with inferior survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) treated with novel agents; however, their role in risk stratification is unclear in the era of the revised International Staging System (R-ISS). The objective of this study was to determine if these predictors improve risk stratification in newly diagnosed MM when accounting for R-ISS and age. We studied a retrospective cohort of 483 patients with newly diagnosed MM treated with proteasome inhibitors and/or immunomodulators. On multivariable analysis, R-ISS, age, metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities (both in aggregate and for specific abnormalities), PCPro, and FISH gain 1q were associated with inferior progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We devised a risk scoring system based on hazard ratios from multivariable analyses and assigned patients to low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups based on their cumulative scores. The addition of metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities, PCPro, and FISH gain 1q to a risk scoring system accounting for R-ISS and age did not improve risk discrimination of Kaplan-Meier estimates for PFS or OS. Moreover, they did not improve prognostic performance when evaluated by Uno's censoring-adjusted C-statistic. Lastly, we performed a paired analysis of metaphase cytogenetic and interphase FISH abnormalities, which revealed the former to be insensitive for the detection of prognostic chromosomal abnormalities. Ultimately, metaphase cytogenetics lack sensitivity for important chromosomal aberrations and, along with PCPro and FISH gain 1q, do not improve risk stratification in MM when accounting for R-ISS and age.
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32442300      PMCID: PMC7252538          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  36 in total

1.  Chromosome 1q21 gains confer inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib but copy number variation and percentage of plasma cells involved have no additional prognostic value.

Authors:  Gang An; Yan Xu; Lihui Shi; Zhong Shizhen; Shuhui Deng; Zhenqing Xie; Weiwei Sui; Fenghuang Zhan; Lugui Qiu
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Cytogenetic abnormalities correlate with the plasma cell labeling index and extent of bone marrow involvement in myeloma.

Authors:  S V Rajkumar; R Fonseca; G W Dewald; T M Therneau; M Q Lacy; R A Kyle; P R Greipp; M A Gertz
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1999-08

Review 3.  Plasma cell myeloma--new biological insights and advances in therapy.

Authors:  B Barlogie; J Epstein; P Selvanayagam; R Alexanian
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  The efficacy of direct, 24-hour culture, and mitotic synchronization methods for cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow in neoplastic hematologic disorders.

Authors:  G W Dewald; D J Broderick; W W Tom; J E Hagstrom; R V Pierre
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1985-09

5.  Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines 2013.

Authors:  Joseph R Mikhael; David Dingli; Vivek Roy; Craig B Reeder; Francis K Buadi; Suzanne R Hayman; Angela Dispenzieri; Rafael Fonseca; Taimur Sher; Robert A Kyle; Yi Lin; Stephen J Russell; Shaji Kumar; P Leif Bergsagel; Steven R Zeldenrust; Nelson Leung; Matthew T Drake; Prashant Kapoor; Stephen M Ansell; Thomas E Witzig; John A Lust; Robert J Dalton; Morie A Gertz; A Keith Stewart; Keith Stewart; S Vincent Rajkumar; Asher Chanan-Khan; Martha Q Lacy
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Measurement of apoptosis and proliferation of bone marrow plasma cells in patients with plasma cell proliferative disorders.

Authors:  T E Witzig; M Timm; D Larson; T Therneau; P R Greipp
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.998

7.  Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Emily Blood; Montserrat Rue; David Harrington; Martin M Oken; Robert A Kyle; Gordon W Dewald; Brian Van Ness; Scott A Van Wier; Kimberly J Henderson; Richard J Bailey; Philip R Greipp
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Value of beta 2-microglobulin level and plasma cell labeling indices as prognostic factors in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.

Authors:  P R Greipp; J A Katzmann; W M O'Fallon; R A Kyle
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  A new staging system for multiple myeloma based on the number of S-phase plasma cells.

Authors:  J F San Miguel; R García-Sanz; M González; M J Moro; J M Hernández; F Ortega; D Borrego; M Carnero; F Casanova; R Jiménez
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Genetics and cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: a workshop report.

Authors:  Rafael Fonseca; Bart Barlogie; Regis Bataille; Christian Bastard; P Leif Bergsagel; Marta Chesi; Faith E Davies; Johannes Drach; Philip R Greipp; Ilan R Kirsch; W Michael Kuehl; Jesus M Hernandez; Stephane Minvielle; Linda M Pilarski; John D Shaughnessy; A Keith Stewart; Herve Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  High-risk disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: beyond the R-ISS and IMWG definitions.

Authors:  Patrick Hagen; Jiwang Zhang; Kevin Barton
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 9.812

2.  Development and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Model for Overall Survival in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Integrating Tumor Burden and Comorbidities.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Jia; Lei Bi; Yuping Chu; Xiao Liu; Juan Feng; Li Xu; Tao Zhang; Hongtao Gu; Lan Yang; Qingxian Bai; Rong Liang; Biao Tian; Yaya Gao; Hailong Tang; Guangxun Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.