Literature DB >> 16129840

Clinical outcomes in t(4;14) multiple myeloma: a chemotherapy-sensitive disease characterized by rapid relapse and alkylating agent resistance.

Wilfrid Jaksic1, Suzanne Trudel, Hong Chang, Young Trieu, Xi Qi, Joseph Mikhael, Donna Reece, Christine Chen, A Keith Stewart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether primary drug resistance or rapid relapse explains the poor prognosis seen in t(4;14)-positive multiple myeloma (MM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 131 patients treated with high-dose therapy (HDT) were assessed, of whom 19 were t(4;14) positive. We examined the presentation features, chemotherapy responsiveness at presentation and to salvage therapies at relapse, and overall survival outcomes.
RESULTS: t(4;14)-positive patients had a predominance of the immunoglobulin A isotype (52.6%) but otherwise baseline characteristics were indistinguishable. After treatment with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone, 17 (89.7%) of the 19 patients achieved a partial response and 11 patients (57.9%) demonstrated an additional 50% reduction in paraprotein after HDT. Thus, t(4;14)-positive patients are chemotherapy sensitive; however, early progression was common, with 26% of patients progressing before HDT and a median progression-free survival after HDT of only 14.1 months. At relapse, a resistance to alkylating agents was evident, with no responses (zero of 11 patients) seen with conventional-dose alkylating agents. Salvage regimens using thalidomide and/or dexamethasone achieved at least minimal response in 59% of patients. The duration of response was short, however, with a median of only 4.7 months. The median overall survival after HDT was 24.2 months.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that t(4;14)-positive MM is chemotherapy sensitive but rapid relapse occurs. Resistance to alkylating agents is evident at relapse. The development of novel therapeutic agents is required, including the early clinical study of targeted fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, which have shown promise in preclinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16129840     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.17.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  24 in total

1.  Chromosome 1q21 gains confer inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib but copy number variation and percentage of plasma cells involved have no additional prognostic value.

Authors:  Gang An; Yan Xu; Lihui Shi; Zhong Shizhen; Shuhui Deng; Zhenqing Xie; Weiwei Sui; Fenghuang Zhan; Lugui Qiu
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Early relapse after autologous transplant for myeloma is associated with poor survival regardless of cytogenetic risk.

Authors:  Jill Corre; Lydia Montes; Elodie Martin; Aurore Perrot; Denis Caillot; Xavier Leleu; Karim Belhadj; Thierry Facon; Cyrille Hulin; Mohamad Mohty; Jean Fontan; Margaret Macro; Sabine Brechignac; Arnaud Jaccard; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Frederique Orsini-Piocelle; Didier Adiko; Laurent Voillat; Faiza Keddar; Marly Barry; Helene Demarquette; Marie-Noelle Certain; Isabelle Plantier; Murielle Roussel; Benjamin Hébraud; Thomas Filleron; Michel Attal; Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  The impact of response kinetics for multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Yuting Yan; Xuehan Mao; Jiahui Liu; Huishou Fan; Chenxing Du; Zengjun Li; Shuhua Yi; Yan Xu; Rui Lv; Wei Liu; Shuhui Deng; Weiwei Sui; Qi Wang; Dehui Zou; Jianxiang Wang; Tao Cheng; Fenghuang Zhan; Yu-Tzu Tai; Chenglu Yuan; Xin Du; Lugui Qiu; Kenneth C Anderson; Gang An
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-10-08

4.  Proteomics-inspired precision medicine for treating and understanding multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Matthew Ho; Giada Bianchi; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2020-02-24

5.  Combining fluorescent in situ hybridization data with ISS staging improves risk assessment in myeloma: an International Myeloma Working Group collaborative project.

Authors:  H Avet-Loiseau; B G M Durie; M Cavo; M Attal; N Gutierrez; J Haessler; H Goldschmidt; R Hajek; J H Lee; O Sezer; B Barlogie; J Crowley; R Fonseca; N Testoni; F Ross; S V Rajkumar; P Sonneveld; J Lahuerta; P Moreau; G Morgan
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  Applying mass spectrometry based proteomic technology to advance the understanding of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Johann Micallef; Moyez Dharsee; Jian Chen; Suzanne Ackloo; Ken Evans; Luqui Qiu; Hong Chang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 7.  Genetic events in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  W J Chng; O Glebov; P L Bergsagel; W M Kuehl
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Microfluidic chips for detecting the t(4;14) translocation and monitoring disease during treatment using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis of IgH-MMSET hybrid transcripts.

Authors:  Jaron VanDijken; Govind V Kaigala; Jana Lauzon; Alexey Atrazhev; Sophia Adamia; Brian J Taylor; Tony Reiman; Andrew R Belch; Christopher J Backhouse; Linda M Pilarski
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Early relapse following initial therapy for multiple myeloma predicts poor outcomes in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  N Majithia; S V Rajkumar; M Q Lacy; F K Buadi; A Dispenzieri; M A Gertz; S R Hayman; D Dingli; P Kapoor; L Hwa; J A Lust; S J Russell; R S Go; R A Kyle; S K Kumar
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  The t(4;14) translocation and FGFR3 overexpression in multiple myeloma: prognostic implications and current clinical strategies.

Authors:  A Kalff; A Spencer
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 11.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.