Literature DB >> 24203792

A generation effect can be found during naturalistic learning.

P A Dewinstanley1.   

Abstract

Recently, Carroll and Nelson (1993) presented research suggesting that general-information questions might represent a boundary condition for the generation effect. The present research focused on whether the generation effect did, in fact, generalize to such questions. In Experiment 1, when subjects read or generated the answers to general-information questions, a generation advantage was demonstrated on a 47-h delayed cued-recall test. However, when the Carroll and Nelson procedure was mimicked by requiring subjects to make an initial attempt to answer the questions, the generation advantage was reduced such that it was no longer statistically significant. In Experiments 2 and 3, the findings of the first experiment generalized to a free-recall test. Thus, general-information questions do not represent a boundary condition for the generation effect.

Year:  1995        PMID: 24203792     DOI: 10.3758/BF03210990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  6 in total

1.  Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.

Authors:  J S Nairne; G L Riegler; M Serra
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Generating makes words memorable, but so does effective reading.

Authors:  I Begg; E Vinski; L Frankovich; B Holgate
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-09

3.  Design controversies and the generation effect: support for an item-order hypothesis.

Authors:  M Serra; J S Nairne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-01

4.  Familiarity, relative distinctiveness, and the generation effect.

Authors:  Z F Peynircioğlu; E Mungan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

5.  Failure to obtain a generation effect during naturalistic learning.

Authors:  M Carroll; T O Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

6.  A generation effect with numbers rather than words.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; J M Rowley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-09
  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience.

Authors:  Benjamin C Storm; Michelle L Hickman; Elizabeth L Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

2.  Processing strategies and the generation effect: implications for making a better reader.

Authors:  Patricia Ann DeWinstanley; Elizabeth Ligon Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

3.  Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Hugh J Foley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

4.  Learning how to learn: can experiencing the outcome of different encoding strategies enhance subsequent encoding?

Authors:  Elzabeth Ligon Bjork; Patricia Ann deWinstanley; Benjamin C Storm
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

5.  Enactment versus conceptual encoding: equivalent item memory but different source memory.

Authors:  Ava J Senkfor; Cyma Van Petten; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  How generation affects source memory.

Authors:  Kindiya D Geghman; Kristi S Multhaup
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.