Literature DB >> 24202957

External extension of double-J ureteral stent during pyeloplasty: inexpensive stent and non-cystoscopic removal.

Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh1, Atefeh Zeinoddini, Maryam Ebadi, Reza Heidari, Afshin Tajalli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to describe our experience with the application of externalized double-J ureteral stent (DJUS) during pyeloplasty for correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in order to avoid cystoscopy for stent removal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pyeloplasty was performed in 523 infants with UPJO using miniature pyeloplasty technique. After removing the obstructed segment, a 3-Fr. DJUS was placed into the ureter. In order to avoid cystoscopy for the removal of the stent, a feeding tube was passed through the skin and renal pelvis via a separate stab incision, connected to the DJUS and secured to the external body surface (skin), and the pyeloplasty was completed. The feeding tube along with the stent was removed after 3-4 weeks, respectively. Postoperative follow-up visits were performed 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure.
RESULTS: The mean operative time was 49 min (range 41-79). Patients were discharged after 17 ± 2 h (mean ± SD). No patient experienced bladder spasm or anticholinergic administration. Forty-four patients (8.4 %) experienced minor complications including non-febrile urinary tract infections and mild hematuria. No major complication including urinoma, leakage, and stent migration or displacement was observed during the follow-up period. Stent removal was tolerated by 99.8 % of patients in an outpatient setting with minimal discomfort without performing cystoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Using external DJUS along with a pyelocutaneous stent extension during pyeloplasty is a safe, feasible, and beneficial technique. This technique resulted in high success rate with minimal cost and no renal injury. The non-cystoscopic stent removal and elimination of urethral catheterization following pyeloplasty are the other advantages of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24202957     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0594-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  19 in total

Review 1.  Stented versus nonstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a modern series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Karen E Smith; Nicholas Holmes; Jeremy I Lieb; James Mandell; Laurence S Baskin; Barry A Kogan; R Dixon Walker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  A novel technique of stenting for laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Waleed Eassa; Ahmed Al Zahrani; Roman Jednak; Mohamed El-Sherbiny; John-Paul Capolicchio
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 1.830

3.  Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Selcuk Yucel; Mindy L Samuelson; Michael T Nguyen; Linda A Baker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Insertion of an internal-external nephroureteral stent during pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: description of the technique.

Authors:  Alessandro Taveres; Numchai Manaboriboon; Armando J Lorenzo; Walid A Farhat
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Use of magnetic internal ureteral stents in pediatric urology: retrieval without routine requirement for cystoscopy and general anesthesia.

Authors:  D J Mykulak; M Herskowitz; K I Glassberg
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Use of internal stent, external transanastomotic stent or no stent during pediatric pyeloplasty: a decision tree cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Jenny H Yiee; Laurence S Baskin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Nephrostomy tube drainage with pyeloplasty: is it necessarily a bad choice?

Authors:  P F Austin; M P Cain; R C Rink
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Miniature pyeloplasty as a minimally invasive surgery with less than 1 day admission in infants.

Authors:  Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Ali Tourchi; Behtash Ghazi Nezami; Mahshid Khakpour; Amir-Abbas Mousavian; Saman Shafaat Talab
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.830

9.  Endoureterotomy as the initial management of concurrent ureteropelvic and ureterovesical junction obstruction after failed conservative therapy.

Authors:  Maryam Ebadi; Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Ali Tourchi; Amir-Abbas Mousavian
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Ureteric stents in pyeloplasty: a help or a hindrance?

Authors:  K Elmalik; M M Chowdhury; S N J Capps
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 1.830

View more
  4 in total

1.  Revisiting the tethered ureteral stents in children: a novel modification.

Authors:  Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Behnam Nabavizadeh; Sorena Keihani; Seyed Hossein Hosseini Sharifi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Transurethral Retrograde Fishing the Double J Urethral Stent: A Tertiary Children Hospital's Experience With a New Technical Strategy.

Authors:  Chengjun Yu; Chun Wei; Junjun Dong; Xingyue He; Yi Wei; Sheng Wen; Tao Lin; Dawei He; Shengde Wu; Guanghui Wei
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Use of double-J ureteric stents post-laparoscopic pyeloplasty to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction in hydronephrosis for pediatric patients: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Haobo Zhu; Jun Wang; Yongji Deng; Liqu Huang; Xiaojiang Zhu; Jun Dong; Jintong Sha; Nannan Gu; Zheng Ge; Geng Ma; Yunfei Guo; Aihua Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Impact of Extracorporeal Stent Placement during Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty on Operative Duration.

Authors:  Hasan Demirkan; Kaya Horasanli
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2021-07-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.