Literature DB >> 18644529

Ureteric stents in pyeloplasty: a help or a hindrance?

K Elmalik1, M M Chowdhury, S N J Capps.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether routine ureteric stenting influences outcome of pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 10-year review was conducted of 105 consecutive open Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasties performed for PUJO, covering two periods: (1) pyeloplasties performed without ureteric stents (1994-1998) and (2) pyeloplasties performed with ureteric stents (1999-2003). Outcomes (expressed as means+/-SEM) of unstented patients (UPs; n=47) and stented patients (SPs; n=58) were compared and results analysed using ANOVA and chi-square tests.
RESULTS: Fifty-five patients (53.9%) presented with antenatal hydronephrosis, whilst 47 (46.1%) presented postnatally (at mean age 88.4+/-7.1 months) with one or more of the following: pain (n=30, 63.8%), urinary tract infection (n=16; 34.0%), haematuria (n=3, 6.4%), abdominal mass (n=3, 6.4%), acute renal failure (n=2, 4.3%), incidental finding (n=4, 8.5%). Pyeloplasty was performed (at mean age 58.9+/-5.3 months) for one or more of the following: pain (n=40, 38.1%), haematuria (n=6, 5.7%), urinary tract infection (n=18, 17.1%), poor initial or deteriorating function (n=29, 27.6%), severe or deteriorating hydronephrosis (n=41, 39.0%), calculus (n=1, 0.95%). Recognised complications of surgery were significantly higher in UPs (5 of 47; 10.6%) than SPs (0 of 58); P=0.016. These were leakage (n=4, 8.5%) and obstruction by blood clot (n=1, 2.1%). Nine SPs (15.5%) developed stent-related complications, including stent migration (n=5, 8.6%), infection (n=3, 5.2%) and calculus (n=1, 1.7%). SPs had significantly shorter hospital stay (2.71+/-0.25 days) than UPs (4.30+/-0.38 days); P<0.01. Preoperative renal pelvis antero-posterior diameter in SPs (3.24+/-0.25 cm) and UPs (3.21+/-0.28 cm) was comparable (P=0.80). Following pyeloplasty, a significant improvement from these preoperative baselines occurred earlier in SPs (at 3.10+/-0.46 months) than UPs (at 15.71+/-3.05 months); P<0.01.
CONCLUSION: Stented pyeloplasty significantly reduces complications from surgery, particularly leakage, and results in shorter hospital stay and earlier resolution of hydronephrosis, but at the expense of stent-related complications which could be avoided in future by the use of external stents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18644529     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.01.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  14 in total

1.  Impact of drainage technique on pediatric pyeloplasty: Comparative analysis of externalized uretero-pyelostomy versus double-J internal stents.

Authors:  Linda C Lee; Niki Kanaroglou; Joseph M Gleason; Joao L Pippi Salle; Darius J Bägli; Martin A Koyle; Armando J Lorenzo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Surgical Approaches to Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Ryan W Tubre; John M Gatti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Is confirmation of ureteric stent placement in laparoscopic pyeloplasty necessary?

Authors:  D B Hennessey; N J Kinnear; R M Evans; C Hagan; A Thwaini
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  External extension of double-J ureteral stent during pyeloplasty: inexpensive stent and non-cystoscopic removal.

Authors:  Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Atefeh Zeinoddini; Maryam Ebadi; Reza Heidari; Afshin Tajalli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Complications of trans-anastomotic externalised stents in open pyeloplasty: influence of the method of placement, the duration of stenting, and the associated bladder drainage.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Alfredo Berrettini; Marcello Cimador; Maria Sergio; Waifro Rigamonti; Enrico DeGrazia
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Comparison between Double J (DJ) Ureteral Stenting and Percutaneous Nephrostomy (PCN) in Obstructive Uropathy.

Authors:  Iftikhar Ahmad; Mudassar Saeed Pansota; Muhammad Tariq; Muhammad Shahzad Saleem; Shafqat Ali Tabassum; Akbar Hussain
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.088

7.  Pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis: Issues of double J stent versus nephrostomy tube as drainage technique.

Authors:  Ravi Kumar Garg; Prema Menon; Katragadda Lakshmi Narasimha Rao; Suman Arora; Yatindra Kumar Batra
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2015-01

8.  Use of fibrin glue as a sealant at the anastomotic line in laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Farouk; Ahmed Tawfick; Mohamed Kotb; Alaa Abdellmaksoud; Ahmed Safaan; Mohamed Yassin; Hassan Shaker
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-09-23

9.  Fibrin glue as a sealant in stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Farouk; Ahmed Tawfick; Mahmoud Reda; Ahmed M Saafan; Waleed Mousa; Ahmed M Tawfeek; Hassan Shaker
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-05-09

10.  A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Outcome after Stented and Nonstented Anderson-Hynes Dismembered Pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Nilesh G Nagdeve; Pravin D Bhingare; Prashant Sarawade
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.