Literature DB >> 12187251

Stented versus nonstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a modern series and review of the literature.

Karen E Smith1, Nicholas Holmes, Jeremy I Lieb, James Mandell, Laurence S Baskin, Barry A Kogan, R Dixon Walker.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dismembered pyeloplasty remains the principal surgical therapy for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction, although the method of postoperative drainage continues to be debated. We compared stented versus nonstented repairs in a modern series.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 117 pediatric dismembered pyeloplasties performed by 3 pediatric urologists at 2 institutions from 1991 to 2000. Hospital stay, success rate and complication rate were reviewed. Results were compared with 833 evaluable cases in the literature.
RESULTS: Of the 52 stented repairs urological complications developed in 6 (12%), including symptomatic urinary tract infection in 3 and temporary obstruction in 3. Of the 65 nonstented repairs urological complications developed in 10 (15%), including prolonged leakage in 3, urinoma in 3, obstruction in 3 and urinary tract infection in 1. Mean hospitalization plus or minus standard error was shorter in the stented group (2.1 +/- 0.89 versus 2.6 +/- 1.1 days, p <0.02). We identified 9 previous studies comparing a total of 339 stented with 494 nonstented repairs. Overall the number of complications was almost equal (12% versus 14%) but the stented group had more infections, whereas more leaks occurred in the nonstented group. The nonstented group required more secondary procedures (12 of 339 versus 45 of 494, p = 0.003). Hospital stay was 12 days for stented and 5 days for nonstented repair in these earlier series.
CONCLUSIONS: In children the outcome of stented pyeloplasty is similar to that of nonstented repair. In contrast to previous reports, using a stent for drainage should not necessitate a longer hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12187251     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000026415.22233.d7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  28 in total

1.  Postoperative outcome following pyeloplasty in children using miniflank incision and transanastomotic stent: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Devendra K Gupta; Shilpa Sharma
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Impact of drainage technique on pediatric pyeloplasty: Comparative analysis of externalized uretero-pyelostomy versus double-J internal stents.

Authors:  Linda C Lee; Niki Kanaroglou; Joseph M Gleason; Joao L Pippi Salle; Darius J Bägli; Martin A Koyle; Armando J Lorenzo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Surgical Approaches to Pediatric Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  Ryan W Tubre; John M Gatti
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Is confirmation of ureteric stent placement in laparoscopic pyeloplasty necessary?

Authors:  D B Hennessey; N J Kinnear; R M Evans; C Hagan; A Thwaini
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  External extension of double-J ureteral stent during pyeloplasty: inexpensive stent and non-cystoscopic removal.

Authors:  Abdol-Mohammad Kajbafzadeh; Atefeh Zeinoddini; Maryam Ebadi; Reza Heidari; Afshin Tajalli
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Complications of trans-anastomotic externalised stents in open pyeloplasty: influence of the method of placement, the duration of stenting, and the associated bladder drainage.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Alfredo Berrettini; Marcello Cimador; Maria Sergio; Waifro Rigamonti; Enrico DeGrazia
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Surgical results of anderson-hynes dismembered pyeloplasty without internal drainage in adults with ureteroplevic junction obstruction.

Authors:  Aliasghar Yarmohamadi; Parisa Saeedi; Amir Hoghabrosadat
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2015-03-20

8.  One day hospitalization after open, double-J stented pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Tunç Ozdemir; Ahmet Arikan
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.764

9.  Laparoscopic stentless pyeloplasty: an early experience.

Authors:  Vikas Kumar; Anil Mandhani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

10.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Dismembered Pyeloplasty with or without Ureteral Stenting in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.

Authors:  June Kim; Sungchan Park; Hyunho Hwang; Jong Won Kim; Sang Hyeon Cheon; Seonghun Park; Kun Suk Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-08-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.