Literature DB >> 24202928

Organogenesis from 'Passe Crassane' and 'Old Home' pear (Pyrus communis L.) protoplasts and isoenzymatic trueness-to-type of the regenerated plants.

S J Ochatt1, E Chevreau, M Gallet.   

Abstract

Large numbers of highly viable mesophyll protoplasts were isolated from shoot cultures of the scion cv 'Passe Crassane' and the rootstock genotype 'Old Home' of common pear (Pyrus communis L.). Protoplasts were cultured for both genotypes either as liquid layers or as liquid-over-agar cultures, in ammonium-free MS medium with 0.5 M mannitol, 50 mg/l casein enzymatic hydrolysate (CEH), 2.0 mg/l NAA and 1.0 mg/l BAP, plus either 0.5 mg/l IAA (for 'Old Home') or 2.0 mg/l IAA (for 'Passe Crassane'). Protoplast microcalli, obtained by day 60 ('Passe Crassane') or day 80 ('Old Home'), were transferred for further growth to ammonium-free MS medium with 2.0 mg/l NAA and 1.0 mg/l BAP. Shoot bud regeneration from the protoplastderived callus was first attempted between 100 ('Passe Crassane') and 120 ('Old Home') days after protoplast isolation. For 'Passe Crassane', shoot buds were regenerated (day 130) on a half-strength MS medium with 0.1 mg/l IBA, 0.5 mg/l BAP, 50 mg/l CEH and 20 mg/l Ca-panthotenate. For 'Old Home', shoot but regeneration only occurred 30 days later and on the same medium as above, which was additionally supplemented with double the concentration of the group B vitamins found in the original MS formulation and 0.05 mg/l GA3. Following micropropagation and in vitro rooting of shoots, the plants were transferred to soil following standard procedures. Trueness-to-type of the regenerated plants was assessed by analysing their leaf isozyme banding profiles (for EST, AP, PRX, SOD, ENP, LAP, PGI, AAT, ADH, MDH and PGM) and comparing them to those corresponding to the original shoots that provided the protoplasts. No differences between the mother shoots and the protoclones were observed for any one of the 11 isozyme systems studied.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 24202928     DOI: 10.1007/BF00232965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  7 in total

1.  Uniformity of plants regenerated from orange (Citrus sinensis Osb.) protoplasts.

Authors:  S Kobayashi
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Protoplasts of higher and lower plants : isolation, culture, and fusion.

Authors:  J B Power; M R Davey
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1990

3.  Selection for salt and drought tolerance in protoplast- and explant-derived tissue cultures of Colt cherry (Prunus avium x pseudocerasus).

Authors:  S J Ochatt; J B Power
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.196

4.  Evidence for quantitative responses during co-culture of Pyrus communis protoplasts and Erwinia amylovora.

Authors:  M N Brisset; S J Ochatt; J P Paulin
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  Somatic hybridization of sexually incompatible top-fruit tree rootstocks, wild pear (Pyrus communis var. pyraster L.) and Colt cherry (Prunus avium x pseudocerasus).

Authors:  S J Ochatt; E M Patat-Ochatt; E L Rech; M R Davey; J B Power
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Callus formation from leaf mesophyll protoplasts of Malus Xdomestica Borkh. cv. Greensleeves.

Authors:  S Doughty; J B Power
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.570

7.  Plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts of Williams' Bon Chretien (syn. Bartlett) pear (Pyrus communis L.).

Authors:  S J Ochatt; J B Power
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.570

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.