Literature DB >> 24202895

Hypermnesia for Socratic stimuli: The growth of recall for an internally generated memory list abstracted from a series of riddles.

M Erdelyi1, H Buschke, S Finkelstein.   

Abstract

Hypermnesia (the increase of recall with time and effort) was tested and contrasted for three conditions of input, each thought to involve different levels of cognitive processing. The basic design involved a multitrial free recall procedure, with groups differing only in the presentation of materials to be remembered. The words subjects (most superficial cognitive processing) recalled a serial list of 40 words; the pictures subjects recalled the same series of 40 pictures; and the Socratic subjects (deepest cognitive processing) recalled an internally generated memory set consisting of covert solutions to 40 riddles, which had been pretested to yield the same 40 items as those of the other groups. While all groups showed spontaneous recovery of additional items on repeated recall without further presentation, as well as faster retrieval rates in early portions of successive recall trials, the increase in the number of items recalled on each trial was greatest for the Socratic group, intermediate for the pictures group, and least for the words group, suggesting that the greater the depth of cognitive processing, the greater the magnitude of hypermnesia.

Year:  1977        PMID: 24202895     DOI: 10.3758/BF03197571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  3 in total

1.  Spontaneous remembering after recall failure.

Authors:  H Buschke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reminiscence and item recovery in free recall.

Authors:  S Madigan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1976-05

3.  Hypermnesia for pictures but not words.

Authors:  S R Shapiro; M H Erdelyi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-12
  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Marquinn D Duke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

2.  The effects of "effort after meaning" on recall: differences in within- and between-subjects designs.

Authors:  Franklin M Zaromb; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06

3.  Unannounced memory tests are not necessarily unexpected by participants: test expectation and its consequences in the repeated test paradigm.

Authors:  Aileen Oeberst; Isabel Lindner
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-06-19

4.  Recall criterion does not affect recall level or hypermnesia: a puzzle for generate/recognize theories.

Authors:  H L Roediger; D G Payne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.