Literature DB >> 24202682

Simple test statistics for major gene detection: a numerical comparison.

P Le Roy1, J M Elsen.   

Abstract

We compare 22 simple tests for the detection of major gene segregation in livestock populations. These tests belong to two groups: methods based on the comparison of within-family distribution and methods based on the comparison of parents' and offspring performances. The power of the 22 tests and the robustness of the two more powerful of these 22 are evaluated by simulation. Thirteen types of major loci, differing in the within-genotype means, variances or alleles frequencies, are studied. Thirty hierarchically balanced populations defined by the number of sire families (5-20), dams per sire (1-20) and progenies per dam (1-20) are simulated. The quantiles are estimated from 2000 samples, the power from 1000 samples and the robustness from 100 samples. The more powerful tests are the within family-variance heterogenity test (Bartlett test) and the within-family mean-variance regression (Fain 1978). Their robustness may be very low, in particular when the trait distribution is skewed.

Year:  1992        PMID: 24202682     DOI: 10.1007/BF00226909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  23 in total

1.  Skewness in commingled distributions.

Authors:  C J Maclean; N E Morton; R C Elston; S Yee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Evidence for a new major gene influencing meat quality in pigs.

Authors:  P Le Roy; J Naveau; J M Elsen; P Sellier
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  [Distribution of frequecies, interpretation of genetic determinism of quantitative characteristics and research of "major genes"].

Authors:  P Mérat
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Index measures for assessing the mode of inheritance of continuously distributed traits: I, theory and justifications.

Authors:  S Karlin; D Carmelli; R Williams
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.570

5.  Properties of the major gene index and related functions.

Authors:  O Mayo; S R Eckert; W H Nugroho
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  Application of the major gene index and offspring-between-parents function to dermatoglyphic fingertip variables.

Authors:  R S Young; T Reed; J A Norton; J C Christian
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  structured exploratory data analysis (SEDA) for determining mode of inheritance of quantitative traits. II. simulation studies on the effect of ascertaining families through high-valued probands.

Authors:  S Karlin; P T Williams
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Influence of major genes on variance within sibships for a quantitative trait.

Authors:  O Mayo; T W Hancock; P A Baghurst
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  [Not Available].

Authors:  P Mérat; F Ricard; G Marche; G Coquerelle
Journal:  Ann Genet Sel Anim       Date:  1974

10.  Structured exploratory data analysis (SEDA) for determining mode of inheritance of quantitative traits. I. Simulation studies on the effect of background distributions.

Authors:  S Karlin; P T Williams; D Carmelli
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  2 in total

1.  Lack of evidence for segregation of a single dominant major gene as the cause of the difference in egg weight between two highly inbred lines of chickens.

Authors:  C Hagger; C Stricker; R C Elston; G Stranzinger
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  A hierarchical statistical model for estimating population properties of quantitative genes.

Authors:  Samuel S Wu; Chang-Xing Ma; Rongling Wu; George Casella
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2002-06-12       Impact factor: 2.797

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.