| Literature DB >> 12097145 |
Samuel S Wu1, Chang-Xing Ma, Rongling Wu, George Casella.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Earlier methods for detecting major genes responsible for a quantitative trait rely critically upon a well-structured pedigree in which the segregation pattern of genes exactly follow Mendelian inheritance laws. However, for many outcrossing species, such pedigrees are not available and genes also display population properties.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12097145 PMCID: PMC117225 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-3-10
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Factorial mating design using female and male parents sampled from a natural population.
| Male | |||||
| — | |||||
| (2 | — | ||||
| — | |||||
| (1) | (1/2:1/2) | — | (1) | ||
| — | |||||
| (2 | (1/2 : 1/2) | (1/4:1/2:1/4) | — | (1/2 : 1/2) | |
| Female | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | |||||
| (2 | (1/2 : 1/2) | (1/4 : 1/4 : 1/4 : 1/4) | — | (1/2 : 1/2) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| — | |||||
| (1) | (1/2:1/2) | — | (1) | ||
The segregation patterns of genotypes are indicated at the parental and progeny generation levels. Genotype frequencies in each generation are given in parentheses.
Figure 1Density estimates of second year stem height (in cm) for all families. The measurement is the stem height at the end of second year. The randomly selected parents are labelled at the top (male) and on the right of plots (female). Trees from eight families did not have growth data due to mortality.
Figure 2Summary of a simulation study based on a 5 × 5 mating design. In each plot we graphed the ideal estimates of the parameter (assuming that we know the genotypes of each offspring) versus the estimates based on the EM algorithm. The top panel corresponds to normal data and the bottom panel to the lognormal case