Literature DB >> 24201028

Privacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL).

Hye-Chung Kum1, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Ashwin Machanavajjhala, Michael K Reiter, Stanley Ahalt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Record linkage to integrate uncoordinated databases is critical in biomedical research using Big Data. Balancing privacy protection against the need for high quality record linkage requires a human-machine hybrid system to safely manage uncertainty in the ever changing streams of chaotic Big Data.
METHODS: In the computer science literature, private record linkage is the most published area. It investigates how to apply a known linkage function safely when linking two tables. However, in practice, the linkage function is rarely known. Thus, there are many data linkage centers whose main role is to be the trusted third party to determine the linkage function manually and link data for research via a master population list for a designated region. Recently, a more flexible computerized third-party linkage platform, Secure Decoupled Linkage (SDLink), has been proposed based on: (1) decoupling data via encryption, (2) obfuscation via chaffing (adding fake data) and universe manipulation; and (3) minimum information disclosure via recoding.
RESULTS: We synthesize this literature to formalize a new framework for privacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL) with tractable privacy and utility properties and then analyze the literature using this framework.
CONCLUSIONS: Human-based third-party linkage centers for privacy preserving record linkage are the accepted norm internationally. We find that a computer-based third-party platform that can precisely control the information disclosed at the micro level and allow frequent human interaction during the linkage process, is an effective human-machine hybrid system that significantly improves on the linkage center model both in terms of privacy and utility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic Health Records (EHR); decoupled data; entity resolution; medical record linkage; privacy; privacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL)

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24201028      PMCID: PMC3932473          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  29 in total

1.  Automatic linkage of vital records.

Authors:  H B NEWCOMBE; J M KENNEDY; S J AXFORD; A P JAMES
Journal:  Science       Date:  1959-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The impact of record-linkage bias in the Cox model.

Authors:  Ileana Baldi; Antonio Ponti; Roberto Zanetti; Giovannino Ciccone; Franco Merletti; Dario Gregori
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Pseudonyms for cancer registries.

Authors:  K Pommerening; M Miller; I Schmidtmann; J Michaelis
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Matching identifiers in electronic health records: implications for duplicate records and patient safety.

Authors:  Allison B McCoy; Adam Wright; Michael G Kahn; Jason S Shapiro; Elmer Victor Bernstam; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Building capacity to assess cancer care in the Medicaid population in New York State.

Authors:  Francis P Boscoe; Deborah Schrag; Kun Chen; Patrick J Roohan; Maria J Schymura
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  A practical approach to achieve private medical record linkage in light of public resources.

Authors:  Mehmet Kuzu; Murat Kantarcioglu; Elizabeth Ashley Durham; Csaba Toth; Bradley Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Quantifying the Correctness, Computational Complexity, and Security of Privacy-Preserving String Comparators for Record Linkage.

Authors:  Elizabeth Durham; Yuan Xue; Murat Kantarcioglu; Bradley Malin
Journal:  Inf Fusion       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 12.975

Review 8.  Privacy technology to support data sharing for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Jiang; Anand D Sarwate; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Medical record linkage in health information systems by approximate string matching and clustering.

Authors:  Erik A Sauleau; Jean-Philippe Paumier; Antoine Buemi
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  The SAIL Databank: building a national architecture for e-health research and evaluation.

Authors:  David V Ford; Kerina H Jones; Jean-Philippe Verplancke; Ronan A Lyons; Gareth John; Ginevra Brown; Caroline J Brooks; Simon Thompson; Owen Bodger; Tony Couch; Ken Leake
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Big Data in Science and Healthcare: A Review of Recent Literature and Perspectives. Contribution of the IMIA Social Media Working Group.

Authors:  M M Hansen; T Miron-Shatz; A Y S Lau; C Paton
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

Review 2.  Big data in medicine is driving big changes.

Authors:  F Martin-Sanchez; K Verspoor
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

3.  Big Data Privacy in Biomedical Research.

Authors:  Shuang Wang; Luca Bonomi; Wenrui Dai; Feng Chen; Cynthia Cheung; Cinnamon S Bloss; Samuel Cheng; Xiaoqian Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Big Data       Date:  2016-09-13

Review 4.  Tools and Methods for Real-World Evidence Generation: Pragmatic Trials, Electronic Consent, and Data Linkages.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; P Jeff Foster; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  SOEMPI: A Secure Open Enterprise Master Patient Index Software Toolkit for Private Record Linkage.

Authors:  Csaba Toth; Elizabeth Durham; Murat Kantarcioglu; Yuan Xue; Bradley Malin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

6.  Enhancing diversity to reduce health information disparities and build an evidence base for genomic medicine.

Authors:  Lucia A Hindorff; Vence L Bonham; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Identifying and prioritizing benefits and risks of using privacy-enhancing software through participatory design: a nominal group technique study with patients living with chronic conditions.

Authors:  Theodoros V Giannouchos; Alva O Ferdinand; Gurudev Ilangovan; Eric Ragan; W Benjamin Nowell; Hye-Chung Kum; Cason D Schmit
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Designing an algorithm to preserve privacy for medical record linkage with error-prone data.

Authors:  Doyel Pal; Tingting Chen; Sheng Zhong; Praveen Khethavath
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2014-01-20

9.  Point-of-contact Interactive Record Linkage (PIRL): A software tool to prospectively link demographic surveillance and health facility data.

Authors:  Christopher T Rentsch; Chodziwadziwa Whiteson Kabudula; Jason Catlett; David Beckles; Richard Machemba; Baltazar Mtenga; Nkosinathi Masilela; Denna Michael; Redempta Natalis; Mark Urassa; Jim Todd; Basia Zaba; Georges Reniers
Journal:  Gates Open Res       Date:  2018-01-11

10.  Probabilistic record linkage of de-identified research datasets with discrepancies using diagnosis codes.

Authors:  Boris P Hejblum; Griffin M Weber; Katherine P Liao; Nathan P Palmer; Susanne Churchill; Nancy A Shadick; Peter Szolovits; Shawn N Murphy; Isaac S Kohane; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 6.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.