Literature DB >> 20367819

The impact of record-linkage bias in the Cox model.

Ileana Baldi1, Antonio Ponti, Roberto Zanetti, Giovannino Ciccone, Franco Merletti, Dario Gregori.   

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Record linkage (RL) has become increasingly useful in health care administration, demographic studies, provision of health statistics and medical research. Linkage failure may occur when databases are affected by missing or inaccurate information. In particular, if the subsets of those who are not linked are not representative of the original population, the results obtained from linked data may be biased. This paper discusses the impact of incomplete RL on survival analysis.
METHODS: In our study we assess by simulations the potential impact of such bias, that we will refer to as RL, on the effect of the covariates in the Cox regression model. We also evaluate the RL bias introduced by an incomplete linkage procedure on the analysis of survival in a cohort of patients with breast cancer.
RESULTS: Our simulation study shows that the relative bias of the factors, which the linking probability depends on, reaches the threshold of 20%, and is never less than 5%. The bias observed in the simulation for a comparable scenario is consistent with the actual one estimated from the breast cancer records.
CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete RL is rarely explicitly taken into account in the models for survival analysis. This study indicates that such a practice is potentially leading to inefficient and biased results, in particular in presence of medium or small sample sizes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20367819     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01119.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  9 in total

Review 1.  Privacy preserving interactive record linkage (PPIRL).

Authors:  Hye-Chung Kum; Ashok Krishnamurthy; Ashwin Machanavajjhala; Michael K Reiter; Stanley Ahalt
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Impact of unlinked deaths and coding changes on mortality trends in the Swiss National Cohort.

Authors:  Kurt Schmidlin; Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Adrian Spoerri; Matthias Egger; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Describing the linkages of the immigration, refugees and citizenship Canada permanent resident data and vital statistics death registry to Ontario's administrative health database.

Authors:  Maria Chiu; Michael Lebenbaum; Kelvin Lam; Nelson Chong; Mahmoud Azimaee; Karey Iron; Doug Manuel; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Impact of linkage quality on inferences drawn from analyses using data with high rates of linkage errors in rural Tanzania.

Authors:  Christopher T Rentsch; Katie Harron; Mark Urassa; Jim Todd; Georges Reniers; Basia Zaba
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Comparing record linkage software programs and algorithms using real-world data.

Authors:  Alan F Karr; Matthew T Taylor; Suzanne L West; Soko Setoguchi; Tzuyung D Kou; Tobias Gerhard; Daniel B Horton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Describing the linkage between administrative social assistance and health care databases in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Claire de Oliveira; Evgenia Gatov; Laura Rosella; Simon Chen; Rachel Strauss; Mahmoud Azimaee; Elizabeth Paterno; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2022-03-03

7.  Evaluating bias due to data linkage error in electronic healthcare records.

Authors:  Katie Harron; Angie Wade; Ruth Gilbert; Berit Muller-Pebody; Harvey Goldstein
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  A guide to evaluating linkage quality for the analysis of linked data.

Authors:  Katie L Harron; James C Doidge; Hannah E Knight; Ruth E Gilbert; Harvey Goldstein; David A Cromwell; Jan H van der Meulen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Good Practice Data Linkage (GPD): A Translation of the German Version.

Authors:  Stefanie March; Silke Andrich; Johannes Drepper; Dirk Horenkamp-Sonntag; Andrea Icks; Peter Ihle; Joachim Kieschke; Bianca Kollhorst; Birga Maier; Ingo Meyer; Gabriele Müller; Christoph Ohlmeier; Dirk Peschke; Adrian Richter; Marie-Luise Rosenbusch; Nadine Scholten; Mandy Schulz; Christoph Stallmann; Enno Swart; Stefanie Wobbe-Ribinski; Antke Wolter; Jan Zeidler; Falk Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.