Literature DB >> 24199603

Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics.

Ji-Hee Park1, Sangwon Park2, Kwangmin Lee3, Kwi-Dug Yun4, Hyun-Pil Lim5.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little clinical information exists on the antagonist wear of anatomic contour zirconia crowns.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the 2-body wear of antagonists for 3 computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) anatomic contour zirconia ceramics and veneering porcelain when opposing natural human enamel.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Zirkonzahn Y-TZP (polished zirconia, zirconia with staining, zirconia with staining and glazing), Acucera Y-TZP, Wieland Y-TZP, and Noritake feldspathic ceramic were tested (6 groups). Eight disk-shaped specimens 15 mm in diameter and 5 mm thick were prepared for each group. Forty-eight specimens were fabricated for a wear test against maxillary premolars without caries or previous restorations with 240 000 masticatory cycles in a masticatory simulator. Before the experiment, the surface roughness of each ceramic was measured with a nanosurface 3-dimensional (3D) optical profiler. The surface of the specimens was observed at 50× and 1000× magnification with a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) before and after the experiment. The data obtained were statistically analyzed by 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey test for post hoc analysis (α=.05).
RESULTS: The SEM observations of each group revealed fine bubbles and porous surfaces in the Noritake feldspathic ceramic group, whereas the polished Zirkonzahn Y-TZP group, Acucera Y-TZP group, and Wieland Y-TZP group had smooth surfaces. The surface roughness of Zirkonzahn Y-TZP after staining and glazing was significantly greater than that of any other groups (P<.01). The tooth opposing the polished Zirkonzahn Y-TZP group demonstrated the least wear (1.11 ± 0.51 mm³), while Zirkonzahn Y-TZP with staining and glazing produced the greatest enamel wear (3.07 ± 0.98 mm³) among the zirconia groups. The Noritake feldspathic ceramic group showed significantly more antagonistic tooth wear than other groups (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The antagonist wear of 3 CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics was significantly less than the Noritake veneering ceramic because the surface character of Y-TZP is relatively uniform and homogeneous. Zirkonzahn Y-TZP with staining and glazing was significantly more abrasive than the other zirconia specimens tested. However, it was less abrasive than the Noritake veneering ceramic.
Copyright © 2014 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24199603     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  11 in total

1.  Surface roughness and wear behavior of occlusal splint materials made of contemporary and high-performance polymers.

Authors:  Merve Benli; Beril Eker Gümüş; Yusuf Kahraman; Bilge Gökçen-Rohlig; Gülümser Evlioğlu; Olivier Huck; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns.

Authors:  J F Esquivel-Upshaw; M J Kim; S M Hsu; N Abdulhameed; R Jenkins; D Neal; F Ren; A E Clark
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Speed sintering translucent zirconia for chairside one-visit dental restorations: Optical, mechanical, and wear characteristics.

Authors:  Marina R Kaizer; Petra C Gierthmuehlen; Mateus Bf Dos Santos; Sergio S Cava; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Ceram Int       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.527

4.  The progressive wear and abrasiveness of novel graded glass/zirconia materials relative to their dental ceramic counterparts.

Authors:  Marina R Kaizer; Rafael R Moraes; Sergio S Cava; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  In vitro fracture resistance of composite-resin-veneered zirconia crowns.

Authors:  Chaimongkon Peampring; Juthatip Aksornmuang; Sasiwimol Sanohkan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

6.  Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns-Results of Different Dental Practitioner Groups.

Authors:  Carla Kozmacs; Britta Hollmann; Wolfgang H Arnold; Ella Naumova; Andree Piwowarczyk
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-14

7.  Effect of different coloring techniques and surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of monolithic zirconia.

Authors:  Rashin Giti; Shekoofeh Haghdoost; Elham Ansarifard
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-03-17

Review 8.  Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance.

Authors:  Eleana Kontonasaki; Athanasios E Rigos; Charithea Ilia; Thomas Istantsos
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-02

Review 9.  Wear Behavior of Different Generations of Zirconia: Present Literature.

Authors:  Kuljirarnat Jitwirachot; Pimduen Rungsiyakull; Julie A Holloway; Wissanee Jia-Mahasap
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-03-07

Review 10.  Synthesis and Biomedical Applications of Zirconium Nanoparticles: Advanced Leaps and Bounds in the Recent Past.

Authors:  Hafiz Muhammad Arshad; Amir Shahzad; Sammia Shahid; Sadaqat Ali; Abdul Rauf; Shahzad Sharif; Muhammad Ehsan Ullah; Muhammad Inam Ullah; Muhammad Ali; Hafiz Ishfaq Ahmad
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.