Literature DB >> 16797222

Clastogenicity, photo-clastogenicity or pseudo-photo-clastogenicity: Genotoxic effects of zinc oxide in the dark, in pre-irradiated or simultaneously irradiated Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Eric K Dufour1, Tirukalikundram Kumaravel, Gerhard J Nohynek, David Kirkland, Hervé Toutain.   

Abstract

Zinc oxide (ZnO), a widely used ingredient in dermatological preparations and sunscreens, is clastogenic in vitro, but not in vivo. Given that ZnO has an approximately four-fold greater clastogenic potency in the presence of UV light when compared with that in the dark, it has been suggested to be photo-clastogenic. In order to clarify whether this increased potency is a genuine photo-genotoxic effect, we investigated the clastogenicity of ZnO (mean particle size, 100 nm) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in the dark (D), in pre-irradiated (PI, i.e. UV irradiation of cells followed by treatment with ZnO) and in simultaneously irradiated (SI, i.e. ZnO treatment concurrent with UV irradiation) CHO cells at UV doses of 350 and 700 mJ/cm(2). The cytotoxicity of ZnO to CHO cells under the different irradiation conditions was as follows: SI>PI>D. In the dark, ZnO produced a concentration-related increase in chromosome aberrations (CA). In PI or SI CHO cells, ZnO was clastogenic at significantly lower concentrations (approximately two- to four-fold) when compared with effective concentrations in the dark, indicating an increased susceptibility of CHO cells to ZnO-mediated clastogenic effects due to UV irradiation per se. The incidence of CA in SI or PI cells was generally higher than that in the dark. At similar ZnO concentrations, SI conditions generally produced higher CA incidence than PI conditions. However, when ZnO concentrations producing similar cytotoxicity were compared, CA incidences under PI or SI conditions were nearly identical. The modest increase in the clastogenic potency of ZnO following UV irradiation contrasts with the results observed with genuine photo-clastogenic agents, such as 8-MOP, which may produce an increase in clastogenic potency of >15,000-fold under SI conditions. Our results provide evidence that, under conditions of in vitro photo-clastogenicity tests, UV irradiation of the cellular test system per se may produce a slight increase in the genotoxic potency of compounds that are clastogenic in the dark. In conclusion, our data suggest that minor increases in clastogenic potency under conditions of photo-genotoxicity testing do not necessarily represent a photo-genotoxic effect, but may occur due to an increased sensitivity of the test system subsequent to UV irradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16797222     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  14 in total

Review 1.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: promises for diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Morteza Mahmoudi; Mohammad A Sahraian; Mohammad A Shokrgozar; Sophie Laurent
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  Evidence of the differential biotransformation and genotoxicity of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants.

Authors:  Martha L López-Moreno; Guadalupe de la Rosa; José A Hernández-Viezcas; Hiram Castillo-Michel; Cristian E Botez; José R Peralta-Videa; Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Fates of Au, Ag, ZnO, and CeO2 Nanoparticles in Simulated Gastric Fluid Studied using Single-Particle-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Xiaolong He; Haiting Zhang; Honglan Shi; Wenyan Liu; Endalkachew Sahle-Demessie
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Epitaxial growth of the zinc oxide nanorods, their characterization and in vitro biocompatibility studies.

Authors:  Ramya Gopikrishnan; Kai Zhang; Prabakaran Ravichandran; Santhoshkumar Biradar; Vani Ramesh; Virupaxi Goornavar; Robert B Jeffers; Aswini Pradhan; Joseph C Hall; Sudhakar Baluchamy; Govindarajan T Ramesh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: focus on their safety and effectiveness.

Authors:  Threes G Smijs; Stanislav Pavel
Journal:  Nanotechnol Sci Appl       Date:  2011-10-13

6.  Do cancer cells in human and meristematic cells in plant exhibit similar responses toward plant extracts with cytotoxic activities?

Authors:  Noha S Khalifa; Hoda S Barakat; Salwa Elhallouty; Dina Salem
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  In vitro genotoxic effects of ZnO nanomaterials in human peripheral lymphocytes.

Authors:  Duygu Gümüş; Ahmet Ali Berber; Kezban Ada; Hüseyin Aksoy
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  High-throughput screening platform for engineered nanoparticle-mediated genotoxicity using CometChip technology.

Authors:  Christa Watson; Jing Ge; Joel Cohen; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Bevin P Engelward; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines.

Authors:  S H Doak; B Manshian; G J S Jenkins; N Singh
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Mutagenic Effects of Nanosilver Consumer Products: a new Approach to Physicochemical Properties.

Authors:  Masomeh Heshmati; Sepideh ArbabiBidgoli; Samideh Khoei; Seyed Mahdi Rezayat; Kazem Parivar
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.696

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.