Literature DB >> 24198088

Using sound to unmask losses disguised as wins in multiline slot machines.

Mike J Dixon1, Karen Collins, Kevin A Harrigan, Candice Graydon, Jonathan A Fugelsang.   

Abstract

Losses disguised as wins (LDWs) are slot machine outcomes where participants bet on multiple lines and win back less than their wager. Despite losing money, the machine celebrates these outcomes with reinforcing sights and sounds. Here, we sought to show that psychophysically and psychologically, participants treat LDWs as wins, but that we could expose LDWs as losses by using negative sounds as feedback. 157 participants were allocated into one of three conditions: a standard sound condition where LDWs, despite being losses, are paired with winning sights and sounds; a silent condition, where LDWs are paired with silence; and a negative sound condition where LDWs and regular losses are both followed by a negative sound. After viewing a paytable, participants conducted 300 spins on a slot machine simulator while heart rate deceleration (HRD) and skin conductance responses (SCRs) were monitored. Participants were then shown 20 different spin outcomes including LDWs and asked whether they had won or lost on that outcome. Participants then estimated on how many spins (out of 300) they won more than they wagered. SCRs were similar for losses and LDWs (both smaller than actual wins). HRD, however, was steeper for both wins and LDWs, compared to losses. In the standard condition, a majority of participants (mis)categorized LDWs as wins, and significantly overestimated the number of times they actually won. In the negative sound condition, this pattern was reversed; most participants correctly categorized LDWs as losses, and they gave high-fidelity win estimates. We conclude that participants both think and physiologically react to LDWs as though they are wins, a miscategorization that misleads them to think that they are winning more often than they actually are. Sound can be used to effectively prevent this misconception and unmask the disguise of LDWs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24198088     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-013-9411-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  6 in total

1.  Electrodermal activity reliably captures physiological differences between wins and losses during gambling on electronic machines.

Authors:  Lisa Lole; Craig J Gonsalvez; Alex Blaszczynski; Adam R Clarke
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines.

Authors:  Mike J Dixon; Kevin A Harrigan; Rajwant Sandhu; Karen Collins; Jonathan A Fugelsang
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  The social contagion of gambling: how venue size contributes to player losses.

Authors:  Matthew J Rockloff; Nancy Greer; Carly Fay
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2011-09

4.  Real and laboratory gambling, sensation-seeking and arousal.

Authors:  G Anderson; R I Brown
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1984-08

5.  Physiological responses to near-miss outcomes and personal control during simulated gambling.

Authors:  Luke Clark; Ben Crooks; Robert Clarke; Michael R F Aitken; Barnaby D Dunn
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2012-03

6.  The impact of sound in modern multiline video slot machine play.

Authors:  Mike J Dixon; Kevin A Harrigan; Diane L Santesso; Candice Graydon; Jonathan A Fugelsang; Karen Collins
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2014-12
  6 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Video Lottery is the Most Harmful Form of Gambling in Canada.

Authors:  Vance Victor MacLaren
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-06

2.  The Role of Auditory Features Within Slot-Themed Social Casino Games and Online Slot Machine Games.

Authors:  Stephanie Bramley; Sally M Gainsbury
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Rise of the Machines: A Critical Review on the Behavioural Effects of Automating Traditional Gambling Games.

Authors:  Tess Armstrong; Matthew Rockloff; Nancy Greer; Phillip Donaldson
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2017-09

4.  Upping the Reinforcement Rate by Playing the Maximum Lines in Multi-line Slot Machine Play.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Templeton; Mike J Dixon; Kevin A Harrigan; Jonathan A Fugelsang
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-09

5.  Reinforcement learning models of risky choice and the promotion of risk-taking by losses disguised as wins in rats.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.478

6.  The Effects of Machine Balance and Free-Spins Features on Machine Preference and Bet Amounts.

Authors:  Lydia A Chapman; Maree J Hunt; Lorance F Taylor; Anne C Macaskill
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2019-12

7.  Relative insensitivity to time-out punishments induced by win-paired cues in a rat gambling task.

Authors:  Angela J Langdon; Brett A Hathaway; Samuel Zorowitz; Cailean B W Harris; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Translating concepts of risk and loss in rodent models of gambling and the limitations for clinical applications.

Authors:  C M Freeland; A S Knes; M J F Robinson
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2020-04-30

9.  Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice.

Authors:  Mariya V Cherkasova; Luke Clark; Jason J S Barton; Michael Schulzer; Mahsa Shafiee; Alan Kingstone; A Jon Stoessl; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Gamble While You Gamble: Electronic Games in Ontario Charitable Gaming Centres.

Authors:  Kevin Harrigan; Dan Brown; Vance MacLaren
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Addict       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.