Literature DB >> 24194829

How long depends on how fast--perceived flicker dilates subjective duration.

Sophie K Herbst1, Amir Homayoun Javadi, Elke van der Meer, Niko A Busch.   

Abstract

How do humans perceive the passage of time and the duration of events without a dedicated sensory system for timing? Previous studies have demonstrated that when a stimulus changes over time, its duration is subjectively dilated, indicating that duration judgments are based on the number of changes within an interval. In this study, we tested predictions derived from three different accounts describing the relation between a changing stimulus and its subjective duration as either based on (1) the objective rate of changes of the stimulus, (2) the perceived saliency of the changes, or (3) the neural energy expended in processing the stimulus. We used visual stimuli flickering at different frequencies (4-166 Hz) to study how the number of changes affects subjective duration. To this end, we assessed the subjective duration of these stimuli and measured participants' behavioral flicker fusion threshold (the highest frequency perceived as flicker), as well as their threshold for a frequency-specific neural response to the flicker using EEG. We found that only consciously perceived flicker dilated perceived duration, such that a 2 s long stimulus flickering at 4 Hz was perceived as lasting as long as a 2.7 s steady stimulus. This effect was most pronounced at the slowest flicker frequencies, at which participants reported the most consistent flicker perception. Flicker frequencies higher than the flicker fusion threshold did not affect perceived duration at all, even if they evoked a significant frequency-specific neural response. In sum, our findings indicate that time perception in the peri-second range is driven by the subjective saliency of the stimulus' temporal features rather than the objective rate of stimulus changes or the neural response to the changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24194829      PMCID: PMC3806760          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  44 in total

1.  HUMAN VISUAL RESPONSES TO SINUSOIDALLY MODULATED LIGHT.

Authors:  L H VAN DER TWEEL; H F LUNEL
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-05

2.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time.

Authors:  Peter Ulric Tse; James Intriligator; Josée Rivest; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-10

Review 3.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Time dilation in dynamic visual display.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Chris L E Paffen; Hinze Hogendoorn; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates.

Authors:  David Burr; Arianna Tozzi; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives.

Authors:  François-Benoît Vialatte; Monique Maurice; Justin Dauwels; Andrzej Cichocki
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals.

Authors:  S Grondin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

Review 9.  Human time perception and its illusions.

Authors:  David M Eagleman
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Speeding up an internal clock in children? Effects of visual flicker on subjective duration.

Authors:  Sylvie Droit-Volet; John Wearden
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2002-07
View more
  17 in total

1.  Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation.

Authors:  Ming Bo Cai; David M Eagleman; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Field dependence-independence differently affects retrospective time estimation and flicker-induced time dilation.

Authors:  Alice Teghil; Maddalena Boccia; Cecilia Guariglia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Trial-by-trial predictions of subjective time from human brain activity.

Authors:  Maxine T Sherman; Zafeirios Fountas; Anil K Seth; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.779

4.  Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations.

Authors:  Kenichi Yuasa; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Temporal frequency of events rather than speed dilates perceived duration of moving objects.

Authors:  Daniel Linares; Andrei Gorea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Duration Adaptation Occurs Across the Sub- and Supra-Second Systems.

Authors:  Shuhei Shima; Yuki Murai; Yuki Hashimoto; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-09

7.  Context-Dependent Neural Modulations in the Perception of Duration.

Authors:  Yuki Murai; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-08

8.  A framework for the first-person internal sensation of visual perception in mammals and a comparable circuitry for olfactory perception in Drosophila.

Authors:  Kunjumon I Vadakkan
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-12-30

9.  Flickering task-irrelevant distractors induce dilation of target duration depending upon cortical distance.

Authors:  Miku Okajima; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  In Search of Oscillatory Traces of the Internal Clock.

Authors:  Tadeusz W Kononowicz; Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.