Literature DB >> 24192136

Fabrication and in vitro characterization of bioactive glass composite scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Patrina S P Poh1, Dietmar W Hutmacher, Molly M Stevens, Maria A Woodruff.   

Abstract

Here we fabricate and characterize bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications. 45S5 Bioglass® (45S5) or strontium-substituted bioactive glass (SrBG) were incorporated into polycaprolactone (PCL) and fabricated into 3D bioactive composite scaffolds utilizing additive manufacturing technology. We show that composite scaffolds (PCL/45S5 and PCL/SrBG) can be reproducibly manufactured with a scaffold morphology highly resembling that of PCL scaffolds. Additionally, micro-CT analysis reveals BG particles were homogeneously distributed throughout the scaffolds. Mechanical data suggested that PCL/45S5 and PCL/SrBG composite scaffolds have higher compressive Young's modulus compared to PCL scaffolds at similar porosity (∼75%). After 1 day in accelerated degradation conditions using 5M NaOH, PCL/SrBG, PCL/45S5 and PCL lost 48.6 ± 3.8%, 12.1 ± 1% and 1.6 ± 1% of the original mass, respectively. In vitro studies were conducted using MC3T3 cells under normal and osteogenic conditions. All scaffolds were shown to be non-cytotoxic, and supported cell attachment and proliferation. Our results also indicate that the inclusion of bioactive glass (BG) promotes precipitation of calcium phosphate on the scaffold surfaces which leads to earlier cell differentiation and matrix mineralization when compared to PCL scaffolds. However, as indicated by alkaline phosphatase activity, no significant difference in osteoblast differentiation was found between PCL/45S5 and PCL/SrBG scaffolds. These results suggest that PCL/45S5 and PCL/SrBG composite scaffolds show potential as next generation bone scaffolds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24192136     DOI: 10.1088/1758-5082/5/4/045005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofabrication        ISSN: 1758-5082            Impact factor:   9.954


  17 in total

1.  Cytotoxicity of resin composites containing bioactive glass fillers.

Authors:  Satin Salehi; Fernanda Gwinner; John C Mitchell; Carmem Pfeifer; Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Strength, toughness, and reliability of a porous glass/biopolymer composite scaffold.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Weitao Jia; Grace Y Lau; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 3.  3D tissue-engineered model of Ewing's sarcoma.

Authors:  Salah-Eddine Lamhamedi-Cherradi; Marco Santoro; Vandhana Ramammoorthy; Brian A Menegaz; Geoffrey Bartholomeusz; Lakesla R Iles; Hesham M Amin; J Andrew Livingston; Antonios G Mikos; Joseph A Ludwig
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Micro-CT Analysis of Bone Healing in Rabbit Calvarial Critical-Sized Defects with Solid Bioactive Glass, Tricalcium Phosphate Granules or Autogenous Bone.

Authors:  Olli-Pekka Lappalainen; Sakari S Karhula; Marianne Haapea; Sami Kauppinen; Mikko Finnilä; Simo Saarakkala; Willy Serlo; George K Sándor
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 5.  Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells.

Authors:  Chengde Gao; Shuping Peng; Pei Feng; Cijun Shuai
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 13.567

6.  Fast-degrading PLA/ORMOGLASS fibrous composite scaffold leads to a calcium-rich angiogenic environment.

Authors:  Nadège Sachot; Agata Roguska; Josep Anton Planell; Malgorzata Lewandowska; Elisabeth Engel; Oscar Castaño
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-07-11

7.  Electrospun F18 Bioactive Glass/PCL-Poly (ε-caprolactone)-Membrane for Guided Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Lucas Hidalgo Pitaluga; Marina Trevelin Souza; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Martin Eduardo Santocildes Romero; Paul V Hatton
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration Based on PCL and Mg-Containing Bioactive Glasses.

Authors:  Mauro Petretta; Alessandro Gambardella; Marco Boi; Matteo Berni; Carola Cavallo; Gregorio Marchiori; Maria Cristina Maltarello; Devis Bellucci; Milena Fini; Nicola Baldini; Brunella Grigolo; Valeria Cannillo
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-04

Review 9.  Deregulation of bone forming cells in bone diseases and anabolic effects of strontium-containing agents and biomaterials.

Authors:  Shuang Tan; Binbin Zhang; Xiaomei Zhu; Ping Ao; Huajie Guo; Weihong Yi; Guang-Qian Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Ultrafast laser processing of materials: from science to industry.

Authors:  Mangirdas Malinauskas; Albertas Žukauskas; Satoshi Hasegawa; Yoshio Hayasaki; Vygantas Mizeikis; Ričardas Buividas; Saulius Juodkazis
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 17.782

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.