Literature DB >> 24189991

Remembering the best and worst of times: memories for extreme outcomes bias risky decisions.

Christopher R Madan1, Elliot A Ludvig, Marcia L Spetch.   

Abstract

When making decisions on the basis of past experiences, people must rely on their memories. Human memory has many well-known biases, including the tendency to better remember highly salient events. We propose an extreme-outcome rule, whereby this memory bias leads people to overweight the largest gains and largest losses, leading to more risk seeking for relative gains than for relative losses. To test this rule, in two experiments, people repeatedly chose between fixed and risky options, where the risky option led equiprobably to more or less than did the fixed option. As was predicted, people were more risk seeking for relative gains than for relative losses. In subsequent memory tests, people tended to recall the extreme outcome first and also judged the extreme outcome as having occurred more frequently. Across individuals, risk preferences in the risky-choice task correlated with these memory biases. This extreme-outcome rule presents a novel mechanism through which memory influences decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24189991     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0542-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories.

Authors:  Jennifer M Talarico; David C Rubin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-09

2.  Decision by sampling.

Authors:  Neil Stewart; Nick Chater; Gordon D A Brown
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Losses as modulators of attention: review and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains.

Authors:  Eldad Yechiam; Guy Hochman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Choosing versus rejecting: why some options are both better and worse than others.

Authors:  E Shafir
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-07

Review 5.  Instance-based learning: integrating sampling and repeated decisions from experience.

Authors:  Cleotilde Gonzalez; Varun Dutt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: a life history theory approach.

Authors:  Vladas Griskevicius; Joshua M Tybur; Andrew W Delton; Theresa E Robertson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2011-06

7.  Neural prediction errors reveal a risk-sensitive reinforcement-learning process in the human brain.

Authors:  Yael Niv; Jeffrey A Edlund; Peter Dayan; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The least likely of times: how remembering the past biases forecasts of the future.

Authors:  Carey K Morewedge; Daniel T Gilbert; Timothy D Wilson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-08

9.  Exploring a multidimensional approach to impulsivity in predicting college student gambling.

Authors:  Meredith K Ginley; James P Whelan; Andrew W Meyers; George E Relyea; Godfrey D Pearlson
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2014-06

10.  Of black swans and tossed coins: is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events?

Authors:  Elliot A Ludvig; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Magnitude and incentives: revisiting the overweighting of extreme events in risky decisions from experience.

Authors:  Emmanouil Konstantinidis; Robert T Taylor; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

2.  Overrepresentation of extreme events in decision making reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Intertwining personal and reward relevance: evidence from the drift-diffusion model.

Authors:  A Yankouskaya; R Bührle; E Lugt; M Stolte; J Sui
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-24

Review 4.  Model-based predictions for dopamine.

Authors:  Angela J Langdon; Melissa J Sharpe; Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Yael Niv
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Strategic encoding and enhanced memory for positive value-location associations.

Authors:  Shawn T Schwartz; Alexander L M Siegel; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-08

6.  Dissociable effects of surprising rewards on learning and memory.

Authors:  Nina Rouhani; Kenneth A Norman; Yael Niv
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The description-experience gap in risky choice in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Sarah R Heilbronner; Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

8.  Episodic memories predict adaptive value-based decision-making.

Authors:  Vishnu P Murty; Oriel FeldmanHall; Lindsay E Hunter; Elizabeth A Phelps; Lila Davachi
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-03-21

Review 9.  Reinforcement Learning and Episodic Memory in Humans and Animals: An Integrative Framework.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  I owe you: age-related similarities and differences in associative memory for gains and losses.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Michael C Friedman; Shannon McGillivray; Cynthia C Flores; Kou Murayama; Tyson Kerr; Aimee Drolet
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2016-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.