Literature DB >> 16438947

Decision by sampling.

Neil Stewart1, Nick Chater, Gordon D A Brown.   

Abstract

We present a theory of decision by sampling (DbS) in which, in contrast with traditional models, there are no underlying psychoeconomic scales. Instead, we assume that an attribute's subjective value is constructed from a series of binary, ordinal comparisons to a sample of attribute values drawn from memory and is its rank within the sample. We assume that the sample reflects both the immediate distribution of attribute values from the current decision's context and also the background, real-world distribution of attribute values. DbS accounts for concave utility functions; losses looming larger than gains; hyperbolic temporal discounting; and the overestimation of small probabilities and the underestimation of large probabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16438947     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  103 in total

1.  A closer look at choice.

Authors:  Sara M Constantino; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making.

Authors:  Sebastian Gluth; Mikhail S Spektor; Jörg Rieskamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Part-set cuing in option generation.

Authors:  Fabio Del Missier; Chiara Terpini
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

4.  Preference patterns for skewed gambles in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Caleb E Strait; Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  A similarity-based range-frequency model for two-category rating data.

Authors:  Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

6.  Primacy or recency effects in forming inductive categories.

Authors:  Sean Duffy; L Elizabeth Crawford
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

Review 7.  Do humans make good decisions?

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Konstantinos Tsetsos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Distributions of observed death tolls govern sensitivity to human fatalities.

Authors:  Christopher Y Olivola; Namika Sagara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Efficient sampling and noisy decisions.

Authors:  Joseph A Heng; Michael Woodford; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Limits in decision making arise from limits in memory retrieval.

Authors:  Gyslain Giguère; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.