Literature DB >> 16102065

The least likely of times: how remembering the past biases forecasts of the future.

Carey K Morewedge1, Daniel T Gilbert, Timothy D Wilson.   

Abstract

Atypical events are both memorable and unrepresentative of their class. We tested the hypotheses that (a) people tend to recall atypical instances of events, and (b) when they are unaware of this, they rely on these atypical instances in forecasting their affective reactions to future events. In three studies, participants who were asked to recall an instance of an event and participants who were asked to recall an atypical instance of an event recalled equally atypical instances. However, only the former participants made extreme forecasts about their reactions to future events. The results suggest that the impact bias (the tendency to overestimate the affective impact of future events) may be due in part to people's reliance on highly available but unrepresentative memories of the past.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16102065     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01585.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  23 in total

1.  Neurobiological substrates of dread.

Authors:  Gregory S Berns; Jonathan Chappelow; Milos Cekic; Caroline F Zink; Giuseppe Pagnoni; Megan E Martin-Skurski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Why the brain talks to itself: sources of error in emotional prediction.

Authors:  Daniel T Gilbert; Timothy D Wilson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: why people overweight probability specifications in affective forecasts.

Authors:  Eva C Buechel; Jiao Zhang; Carey K Morewedge; Joachim Vosgerau
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-10-14

4.  Highly accurate prediction of emotions surrounding the attacks of September 11, 2001 over 1-, 2-, and 7-year prediction intervals.

Authors:  Bruce P Doré; Robert Meksin; Mara Mather; William Hirst; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 5.  Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2012-11

6.  A Review of Anticipatory Pleasure in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katherine H Frost; Gregory P Strauss
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-06-30

7.  Comparing numbers of drinks: college students' reports from retrospective summary, followback, and prospective daily diary measures.

Authors:  Megan E Patrick; Christine M Lee
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 8.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis; Demis Hassabis; Victoria C Martin; R Nathan Spreng; Karl K Szpunar
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Trends in ambulatory self-report: the role of momentary experience in psychosomatic medicine.

Authors:  Tamlin S Conner; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.