Literature DB >> 24188136

Candida species distribution and antifungal susceptibility testing according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and new vs. old Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute clinical breakpoints: a 6-year prospective candidaemia survey from the fungal infection network of Switzerland.

C Orasch1, O Marchetti, J Garbino, J Schrenzel, S Zimmerli, K Mühlethaler, G Pfyffer, C Ruef, J Fehr, R Zbinden, T Calandra, J Bille.   

Abstract

We analyzed the species distribution of Candida blood isolates (CBIs), prospectively collected between 2004 and 2009 within FUNGINOS, and compared their antifungal susceptibility according to clinical breakpoints defined by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) in 2013, and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) in 2008 (old CLSI breakpoints) and 2012 (new CLSI breakpoints). CBIs were tested for susceptiblity to fluconazole, voriconazole and caspofungin by microtitre broth dilution (Sensititre® YeastOne™ test panel). Of 1090 CBIs, 675 (61.9%) were C. albicans, 191 (17.5%) C. glabrata, 64 (5.9%) C. tropicalis, 59 (5.4%) C. parapsilosis, 33 (3%) C. dubliniensis, 22 (2%) C. krusei and 46 (4.2%) rare Candida species. Independently of the breakpoints applied, C. albicans was almost uniformly (>98%) susceptible to all three antifungal agents. In contrast, the proportions of fluconazole- and voriconazole-susceptible C. tropicalis and F-susceptible C. parapsilosis were lower according to EUCAST/new CLSI breakpoints than to the old CLSI breakpoints. For caspofungin, non-susceptibility occurred mainly in C. krusei (63.3%) and C. glabrata (9.4%). Nine isolates (five C. tropicalis, three C. albicans and one C. parapsilosis) were cross-resistant to azoles according to EUCAST breakpoints, compared with three isolates (two C. albicans and one C. tropicalis) according to new and two (2 C. albicans) according to old CLSI breakpoints. Four species (C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis) represented >90% of all CBIs. In vitro resistance to fluconazole, voriconazole and caspofungin was rare among C. albicans, but an increase of non-susceptibile isolates was observed among C. tropicalis/C. parapsilosis for the azoles and C. glabrata/C. krusei for caspofungin according to EUCAST and new CLSI breakpoints compared with old CLSI breakpoints.
© 2013 The Authors Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2013 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breakpoint; Candida; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; candidaemia; resistance; species

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24188136     DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  38 in total

1.  Clinical and microbiological investigation of fungemia from four hospitals in China.

Authors:  Danfeng Dong; Zhen Li; Lihua Zhang; Cen Jiang; Enqiang Mao; Xuefeng Wang; Yibing Peng
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida Isolates with the EUCAST Methodology, a New Method for ECOFF Determination.

Authors:  J Meletiadis; I Curfs-Breuker; J F Meis; J W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The association between treatment appropriateness according to EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints and mortality among patients with candidemia: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Nesrin Ghanem-Zoubi; Danny Zorbavel; Johad Khoury; Yuval Geffen; Majd Qasum; Svetlana Predescu; Mical Paul
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Cross-resistance between voriconazole and fluconazole for non-albicans Candida infection: a case-case-control study.

Authors:  Y Wang; Q Yang; L Chen; L Liu; R Hao; T Zhang; X Wang; J Lei; J Xie; Y Dong
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Epidemiology and reporting of candidaemia in Belgium: a multi-centre study.

Authors:  C Trouvé; S Blot; M-P Hayette; S Jonckheere; S Patteet; H Rodriguez-Villalobos; F Symoens; E Van Wijngaerden; K Lagrou
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Berkow; Shawn R Lockhart; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Candida parapsilosis: from Genes to the Bedside.

Authors:  Renáta Tóth; Jozef Nosek; Héctor M Mora-Montes; Toni Gabaldon; Joseph M Bliss; Joshua D Nosanchuk; Siobhán A Turner; Geraldine Butler; Csaba Vágvölgyi; Attila Gácser
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Candida lusitaniae MICs to the echinocandins are elevated but FKS-mediated resistance is rare.

Authors:  Shawn R Lockhart; Cau D Pham; Randall J Kuykendall; Carol B Bolden; Angela A Cleveland
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  Genetic Basis of Azole and Echinocandin Resistance in Clinical Candida glabrata in Japan.

Authors:  Hazim O Khalifa; Teppei Arai; Hidetaka Majima; Akira Watanabe; Katsuhiko Kamei
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Peter G Pappas; Carol A Kauffman; David R Andes; Cornelius J Clancy; Kieren A Marr; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Annette C Reboli; Mindy G Schuster; Jose A Vazquez; Thomas J Walsh; Theoklis E Zaoutis; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.