Literature DB >> 24187963

Mechanistic modeling identifies drug-uptake history as predictor of tumor drug resistance and nano-carrier-mediated response.

Jennifer Pascal1, Carlee E Ashley2,3, Zhihui Wang1, Terisse A Brocato4, Joseph D Butner4, Eric C Carnes5,4,3, Eugene J Koay6,7, C Jeffrey Brinker4,8,3,9,10, Vittorio Cristini1,4,3.   

Abstract

A quantitative understanding of the advantages of nanoparticle-based drug delivery vis-à-vis conventional free drug chemotherapy has yet to be established for cancer or other diseases despite numerous investigations. Here, we employ first-principles cell biophysics, drug pharmaco-kinetics, and drug pharmaco-dynamics to model the delivery of doxorubicin (DOX) to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor cells and predict the resultant experimental cytotoxicity data. The fundamental, mechanistic hypothesis of our mathematical model is that the integrated history of drug uptake by the cells over time of exposure, which sets the cell death rate parameter, and the uptake rate are the sole determinants of the dose response relationship. A universal solution of the model equations is capable of predicting the entire, nonlinear dose response of the cells to any drug concentration based on just two separate measurements of these cellular parameters. This analysis reveals that nanocarrier-mediated delivery overcomes resistance to the free drug because of improved cellular uptake rates, and that dose response curves to nanocarrier mediated drug delivery are equivalent to those for free-drug, but "shifted to the left;" that is, lower amounts of drug achieve the same cell kill. We then demonstrate the model's general applicability to different tumor and drug types, and cell-exposure time courses by investigating HCC cells exposed to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil, breast cancer MCF-7 cells exposed to DOX, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma PANC-1 cells exposed to gemcitabine. The model will help in the optimal design of nanocarriers for clinical applications and improve the current, largely empirical understanding of in vivo drug transport and tumor response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24187963      PMCID: PMC3891887          DOI: 10.1021/nn4048974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  24 in total

1.  A mathematical model for comparison of bolus injection, continuous infusion, and liposomal delivery of doxorubicin to tumor cells.

Authors:  A W El-Kareh; T W Secomb
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Modeling of the time-dependency of in vitro drug cytotoxicity and resistance.

Authors:  L M Levasseur; H K Slocum; Y M Rustum; W R Greco
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Two-mechanism peak concentration model for cellular pharmacodynamics of Doxorubicin.

Authors:  Ardith W El-Kareh; Timothy W Secomb
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  Porous nanoparticle supported lipid bilayers (protocells) as delivery vehicles.

Authors:  Juewen Liu; Alison Stace-Naughton; Xingmao Jiang; C Jeffrey Brinker
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Predicting drug pharmacokinetics and effect in vascularized tumors using computer simulation.

Authors:  John P Sinek; Sandeep Sanga; Xiaoming Zheng; Hermann B Frieboes; Mauro Ferrari; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  Simulation model of doxorubicin activity in islets of human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Jan Lankelma; Rafael Fernández Luque; Henk Dekker; Herbert M Pinedo
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2003-08-22

7.  Prediction of drug response in breast cancer using integrative experimental/computational modeling.

Authors:  Hermann B Frieboes; Mary E Edgerton; John P Fruehauf; Felicity R A J Rose; Lisa K Worrall; Robert A Gatenby; Mauro Ferrari; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer.

Authors:  Kwangjae Cho; Xu Wang; Shuming Nie; Zhuo Georgia Chen; Dong M Shin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer.

Authors:  Mark E Davis; Zhuo Georgia Chen; Dong M Shin
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 84.694

10.  Two-dimensional chemotherapy simulations demonstrate fundamental transport and tumor response limitations involving nanoparticles.

Authors:  J Sinek; H Frieboes; X Zheng; V Cristini
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.838

View more
  29 in total

1.  Spatial Quantification of Drugs in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Lesions by Laser Capture Microdissection Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (LCM-LC/MS).

Authors:  Matthew Zimmerman; Landry Blanc; Pei-Yu Chen; Véronique Dartois; Brendan Prideaux
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on tumor vascular features in needle biopsies.

Authors:  Terisse A Brocato; Ursa Brown-Glaberman; Zhihui Wang; Reed G Selwyn; Colin M Wilson; Edward F Wyckoff; Lesley C Lomo; Jennifer L Saline; Anupama Hooda-Nehra; Renata Pasqualini; Wadih Arap; C Jeffrey Brinker; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-03-05

Review 3.  Optimizing nanomedicine pharmacokinetics using physiologically based pharmacokinetics modelling.

Authors:  Darren Michael Moss; Marco Siccardi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  Integrated PK-PD and agent-based modeling in oncology.

Authors:  Zhihui Wang; Joseph D Butner; Vittorio Cristini; Thomas S Deisboeck
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Transport properties of pancreatic cancer describe gemcitabine delivery and response.

Authors:  Eugene J Koay; Mark J Truty; Vittorio Cristini; Ryan M Thomas; Rong Chen; Deyali Chatterjee; Ya'an Kang; Priya R Bhosale; Eric P Tamm; Christopher H Crane; Milind Javle; Matthew H Katz; Vijaya N Gottumukkala; Marc A Rozner; Haifa Shen; Jeffery E Lee; Huamin Wang; Yuling Chen; William Plunkett; James L Abbruzzese; Robert A Wolff; Gauri R Varadhachary; Mauro Ferrari; Jason B Fleming
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Editorial: Special Section on Multiscale Cancer Modeling.

Authors:  Zhihui Wang; Philip K Maini
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  Ligand-targeted theranostic nanomedicines against cancer.

Authors:  Virginia J Yao; Sara D'Angelo; Kimberly S Butler; Christophe Theron; Tracey L Smith; Serena Marchiò; Juri G Gelovani; Richard L Sidman; Andrey S Dobroff; C Jeffrey Brinker; Andrew R M Bradbury; Wadih Arap; Renata Pasqualini
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Understanding Drug Resistance in Breast Cancer with Mathematical Oncology.

Authors:  Terisse Brocato; Prashant Dogra; Eugene J Koay; Armin Day; Yao-Li Chuang; Zhihui Wang; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2014-06-01

9.  Development of a Physiologically-Based Mathematical Model for Quantifying Nanoparticle Distribution in Tumors.

Authors:  Prashant Dogra; Yao-Li Chuang; Joseph D Butner; Vittorio Cristini; Zhihui Wang
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

10.  Mathematical Modeling to Address Challenges in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Prashant Dogra; Javier R Ramírez; María J Peláez; Zhihui Wang; Vittorio Cristini; Gulshan Parasher; Manmeet Rawat
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.