Literature DB >> 11005567

A mathematical model for comparison of bolus injection, continuous infusion, and liposomal delivery of doxorubicin to tumor cells.

A W El-Kareh1, T W Secomb.   

Abstract

Determining the optimal mode of delivery for doxorubicin is important given the wide use of the drug against many tumor types. The relative performances of bolus injection, continuous infusion, liposomal and thermoliposomal delivery are not yet definitely established from clinical trials. Here, a mathematical model is used to compare bolus injection, continuous infusion for various durations, liposomal and thermoliposomal delivery of doxorubicin. Effects of the relatively slow rate, and saturability, of doxorubicin uptake by cells are included. Peak concentrations attained in tumor cells are predicted and used as a measure of antitumor effectiveness. To measure toxicity, plasma area under the curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentrations of free doxorubicin are computed. For continuous infusion, the duration of infusion significantly affects predicted outcome. The optimal infusion duration increases with dose, and is in the range 1 to 3 hours at typical doses. The simulations suggest that continuous infusion for optimal durations is superior to the other protocols. Nonthermosensitive liposomes approach the efficacy of continuous infusion only if they release drug at optimal rates. Predictions for thermosensitive liposomes indicate a potential advantage at some doses, but only if hyperthermia is applied locally so that the blood is not significantly heated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11005567      PMCID: PMC1550297          DOI: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neoplasia        ISSN: 1476-5586            Impact factor:   5.715


  60 in total

1.  Infusional anthracyclines: is slower better? If so, why?

Authors:  P Workman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Radiologic assessment of intranodal vascularity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Correlation with histologic vascular density.

Authors:  S Lamer; R Sigal; N Lassau; J Bosq; F Frouin; M Di Paola; G Mamelle; J Leclère; J Bittoun; R Di Paola
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  The influence of tumor cell density on cellular accumulation of doxorubicin or cisplatin in vitro.

Authors:  Y Takemura; H Kobayashi; H Miyachi; K Hayashi; S Sekiguchi; T Ohnuma
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  [The degree of tumor vascularization as a prognostic factor of the efficacy of neoadjuvant polychemotherapy in breast cancer].

Authors:  E K Voznyĭ; M Iu Biakhov; A I Gorb; E V Krivenko; V D Chkhikvadze; L A Alipchenko; I A Agrinskaia
Journal:  Vopr Onkol       Date:  1992

5.  Doxorubicin and doxorubicinol pharmacokinetics and tissue concentrations following bolus injection and continuous infusion of doxorubicin in the rabbit.

Authors:  B J Cusack; S P Young; J Driskell; R D Olson
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Antibody-targeted delivery of doxorubicin entrapped in sterically stabilized liposomes can eradicate lung cancer in mice.

Authors:  I Ahmad; M Longenecker; J Samuel; T M Allen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Microscopic localization of sterically stabilized liposomes in colon carcinoma-bearing mice.

Authors:  S K Huang; K D Lee; K Hong; D S Friend; D Papahadjopoulos
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  A prospective randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with bolus versus continuous infusion of doxorubicin in patients with high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma and an analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  E S Casper; J J Gaynor; S I Hajdu; G B Magill; C Tan; C Friedrich; M F Brennan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Doxorubicin resistance in P388 leukemia--evidence for reduced drug influx.

Authors:  A Ramu; H B Pollard; L M Rosario
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1989-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  A comparative study on the antitumor effect, cardiotoxicity and nephrotoxicity of doxorubicin given as a bolus, continuous infusion or entrapped in liposomes in the Lou/M Wsl rat.

Authors:  G Storm; Q G van Hoesel; G de Groot; W Kop; P A Steerenberg; F C Hillen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  43 in total

1.  Targeted drug delivery by high intensity focused ultrasound mediated hyperthermia combined with temperature-sensitive liposomes: computational modelling and preliminary in vivovalidation.

Authors:  Astrid Gasselhuber; Matthew R Dreher; Ari Partanen; Pavel S Yarmolenko; David Woods; Bradford J Wood; Dieter Haemmerich
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.914

2.  Mathematical spatio-temporal model of drug delivery from low temperature sensitive liposomes during radiofrequency tumour ablation.

Authors:  Astrid Gasselhuber; Matthew R Dreher; Ayele Negussie; Bradford J Wood; Frank Rattay; Dieter Haemmerich
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.914

3.  Mathematical Modelling of Convection Enhanced Delivery of Carmustine and Paclitaxel for Brain Tumour Therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Zhan; Davis Yohanes Arifin; Timothy Ky Lee; Chi-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Composite Hydrogel Embedded with Porous Microspheres for Long-Term pH-Sensitive Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Xifeng Liu; Kevin A Fundora; Zifei Zhou; Alan Lee Miller; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Nanoscale Drug Delivery and Hyperthermia: The Materials Design and Preclinical and Clinical Testing of Low Temperature-Sensitive Liposomes Used in Combination with Mild Hyperthermia in the Treatment of Local Cancer.

Authors:  Chelsea D Landon; Ji-Young Park; David Needham; Mark W Dewhirst
Journal:  Open Nanomed J       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 6.  Systems biology approaches to adverse drug effects: the example of cardio-oncology.

Authors:  Sherry-Ann Brown; Nicole Sandhu; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Mechanisms of enhanced drug delivery in brain metastases with focused ultrasound-induced blood-tumor barrier disruption.

Authors:  Costas D Arvanitis; Vasileios Askoxylakis; Yutong Guo; Meenal Datta; Jonas Kloepper; Gino B Ferraro; Miguel O Bernabeu; Dai Fukumura; Nathan McDannold; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A phase I study of SPI-077 (Stealth liposomal cisplatin) concurrent with radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  David I Rosenthal; Sue S Yom; Li Liu; Mitchell Machtay; Kenneth Algazy; Randal S Weber; Gregory S Weinstein; Ara A Chalian; Linda K Mille; Kenneth Rockwell; Margaret Tonda; Edward Schnipper; Diane Hershock
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  A tumor cord model for doxorubicin delivery and dose optimization in solid tumors.

Authors:  Steffen Eikenberry
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 2.432

10.  Oscillatory dynamics in a model of vascular tumour growth--implications for chemotherapy.

Authors:  I J Stamper; M R Owen; P K Maini; H M Byrne
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.540

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.