Literature DB >> 24186268

Influence and compensation of truncation artifacts in MR-based attenuation correction in PET/MR.

G Schramm, J Langner, F Hofheinz, J Petr, A Lougovski, B Beuthien-Baumann, I Platzek, J van den Hoff.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The goal of this article is to quantify the influence of truncation artifacts in the magnetic resonance (MR)-based attenuation map (MRMap) on reconstructed positron emission tomography (PET) image volumes and to propose a new method for minimizing this influence.
METHODS: PET data sets of 20 patients investigated in a Philips Ingenuity PET/MR were reconstructed with and without applying two different methods for truncation compensation (TC1 vendor-provided, TC2 newly developed). In this patient group, the extent of truncation artifacts and quality of the truncation compensation (TC) was assessed visually in the MRMaps. In three additional patients MRMaps generated by algorithm TC2 could be compared to the ground truth of transmission-based attenuation maps obtained with a Siemens ECAT HR(+) scanner. The influence of truncation on regional SUVs in lesions, other hot structures (bladder, kidney, myocardium) and the arms was assessed in suitable volume of interests (VOI).
RESULTS: Truncation compensated MRMaps exhibited residual artifacts in the arms in 16 patients for algorithm TC1 and to a lesser extent in eight patients for algorithm TC2. Compared to the transmission-based attenuation maps algorithm TC2 slightly overestimated the size of the truncated arms by 0.3 cm in the radial direction. Without truncation compensation, VOIs located in the trunk showed an average SUVmax underestimation of less than 5.4% relative to the results obtained with TC2. Inside the patients' arms underestimations up to 46.5% were found.
CONCLUSION: In the trunk, standardized uptake values (SUV) underestimations due to truncation artifacts in the MRMap are rather small. Inside the arms, severe SUV underestimations can occur. Therefore, reliable TC is mandatory and can be achieved by applying the newly developed algorithm TC2 which has yielded promising results so far. Implementation of the proposed method is straightforward and should be easily adaptable to other PET/MR systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24186268     DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2272660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  10 in total

1.  Automatic correction of dental artifacts in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Claes N Ladefoged; Flemming L Andersen; Sune H Keller; Thomas Beyer; Ian Law; Liselotte Højgaard; Sune Darkner; Francois Lauze
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-06-09

Review 2.  Combined PET/MR: Where are we now? Summary report of the second international workshop on PET/MR imaging April 8-12, 2013, Tubingen, Germany.

Authors:  Dale L Bailey; Henryk Barthel; Bettina Beuthin-Baumann; Thomas Beyer; Sotirios Bisdas; Ronald Boellaard; Johannes Czernin; Alexander Drzezga; Ulrike Ernemann; Christiane Franzius; Brigitte Gückel; Rupert Handgretinger; Markus Hartenbach; Dirk Hellwig; Helen Nadel; Stephan G Nekolla; Thomas Pfluger; Bernd J Pichler; Harald H Quick; Osama Sabri; Bernhard Sattler; Jürgen Schäfer; Fritz Schick; Barry A Siegel; Heinz P Schlemmer; Nina F Schwenzer; Jörg van den Hoff; Patrick Veit-Haibach; Hans F Wehrl
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  MR Imaging-Guided Attenuation Correction of PET Data in PET/MR Imaging.

Authors:  David Izquierdo-Garcia; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2016-01-26

4.  Investigating the state-of-the-art in whole-body MR-based attenuation correction: an intra-individual, inter-system, inventory study on three clinical PET/MR systems.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Martin L Lassen; Ronald Boellaard; Gaspar Delso; Maqsood Yaqub; Bernhard Sattler; Harald H Quick
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Synthetic CT generation from non-attenuation corrected PET images for whole-body PET imaging.

Authors:  Xue Dong; Tonghe Wang; Yang Lei; Kristin Higgins; Tian Liu; Walter J Curran; Hui Mao; Jonathon A Nye; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  [PET/MRI].

Authors:  Bettina Beuthien-Baumann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  [68Ga]Ga-NODAGA-E[(cRGDyK)]2 PET and hyperpolarized [1-13C] pyruvate MRSI (hyperPET) in canine cancer patients: simultaneous imaging of angiogenesis and the Warburg effect.

Authors:  Andreas Clemmensen; Adam E Hansen; Pernille Holst; Christina Schøier; Sissel Bisgaard; Helle H Johannesen; Jan Henrik Ardenkjær-Larsen; Annemarie T Kristensen; Andreas Kjaer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  A deep learning-based whole-body solution for PET/MRI attenuation correction.

Authors:  Sahar Ahangari; Anders Beck Olin; Marianne Kinggård Federspiel; Bjoern Jakoby; Thomas Lund Andersen; Adam Espe Hansen; Barbara Malene Fischer; Flemming Littrup Andersen
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-08-17

9.  Design and system evaluation of a dual-panel portable PET (DP-PET).

Authors:  Tianyi Zeng; Jiaxu Zheng; Xinyuan Xia; Xin Chen; Beien Wang; Shuangyue Zhang; Adam Chandler; Tuoyu Cao; Lingzhi Hu; Qun Chen; Xu Chu
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2021-06-12

Review 10.  Metal artifact correction strategies in MRI-based attenuation correction in PET/MRI.

Authors:  Georg Schramm; Claes Nøhr Ladefoged
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-11-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.